13

I Want My Freedom Back

Posted by straightlinelogic 10 years, 8 months ago to Government
82 comments | Share | Best of... | Flag

Earlier this week, edweaver submitted a post, "Does a person have to die to be free?" In it, he asked: "Is death the only way to rid yourself of government?" I submitted a response keyed to that question, and the response developed a thread. However, I wanted to submit what I said to the entire Gulch community to see what everyone had to say about it. Here goes:

One realization that has come to me, far slower than it should have, is that it is not enough to be against statism and government, one has to be for something, to have a vision of where one wants to go. The Fountainhead sounds the tocsin against the encroaching state, and Atlas Shrugged painted the dystopian future after that encroaching state has smothered everything in its path. However, Rand never presented a vision of a world in which the things she was fighting for—liberty, limited government, rational self-interest, and capitalism—had triumphed. One of the reasons I wrote The Golden Pinnacle, which you read, Ed, is to, if not show a world where those ideals had triumphed, to at least show what America was like when we approached the pinnacle of freedom during the Industrial Revolution. It is the first of a trilogy, and the third novel will offer the ultimate utopian vision.

You can look at the current nightmare and despair. You ask: “how do ever get the government out of our lives?” Reformulate your question: “how do we restore freedom in America?” It may seem a trivial point, but the first question is akin to: “how do we get the cockroaches out of our kitchen?” It’s a valid question, and the cockroaches have to be eradicated, but it’s mundane and uninspiring. Restoring freedom, on the other hand, inspires, and freedom’s proponents aren’t left just pointing out the deleterious consequences of statism and coercion (even, or especially, for the so-called beneficiaries), but can instead frame the issues in terms of people building better lives for themselves and their families, unobstructed by the state, reaping their just rewards, and rediscovering respect for themselves and their fellow citizens. People need to strive for higher goals than cockroach eradication. (Even that task sounds more palatable if you reformulate it is a part of the job of making your kitchen sparkling clean.)

If we Gulchers frame our goal as restoring freedom, then that can be done in ways large and small. Realize that like all corrupt, overreaching, overextended, overly indebted governments, ours will fail. A big part of our job will be done, but if all we can offer is: “told you so, told you so,” it will not matter. Winston Churchill said, “You can always count on Americans to do the right thing—after they’ve tried everything else.” After the collapse, many Americans will be ready to try the right thing: restoring freedom. The government will be bankrupt and continuation of the welfare state and foreign adventurism will be fiscally impossible. But intellectual revolutions always precede actual revolutions, so it is now that we must make the case not just against current arrangements, but the positive case for restoring freedom, in every way that we can. That’s what leaders do.

Thoughts?


All Comments


Previous comments...   You are currently on page 4.
  • Posted by $ Commander 10 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Never ceases to amaze me.....interpretation of word-symbols. I appreciate your profound ability to dialog.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by CarolSeer2014 10 years, 8 months ago
    To add to the theme of freedom v liberty:
    my dictionary defines "licentiousness" as an excess of freedom constituting an abuse of liberty.
    But maybe it is an excess of liberty constituting an abuse of freedom.
    Whatever, you cannot have true freedom/liberty without restraint or responsibility, in my view, anyway.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 10 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I used freedom in my response because edweaver had asked "Does a person have to die to be free?" I agree with you that on an intellectual level, liberty connotes a certain responsibility. However, I think freedom packs more of an emotional wallop. My emotional reaction to freedom is not "Lord of the Flies," but rather Braveheart, where it is the refrain throughout the movie, and especially at the end, when William Wallace shouts it as he's being drawn and quartered. I think that scene would have been less effective had he yelled, "Liberty!"
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Commander 10 years, 8 months ago
    I have always been proactive in solutions beyond conflicts. I wholeheartedly concur with your vision.
    I have one very strong objection. Supplant "freedom" with "Liberty". Liberty implies responsibility to self and community extant. "Freedom" reminds me too much of "Lord of the Flies".
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo