I Want My Freedom Back
Earlier this week, edweaver submitted a post, "Does a person have to die to be free?" In it, he asked: "Is death the only way to rid yourself of government?" I submitted a response keyed to that question, and the response developed a thread. However, I wanted to submit what I said to the entire Gulch community to see what everyone had to say about it. Here goes:
One realization that has come to me, far slower than it should have, is that it is not enough to be against statism and government, one has to be for something, to have a vision of where one wants to go. The Fountainhead sounds the tocsin against the encroaching state, and Atlas Shrugged painted the dystopian future after that encroaching state has smothered everything in its path. However, Rand never presented a vision of a world in which the things she was fighting for—liberty, limited government, rational self-interest, and capitalism—had triumphed. One of the reasons I wrote The Golden Pinnacle, which you read, Ed, is to, if not show a world where those ideals had triumphed, to at least show what America was like when we approached the pinnacle of freedom during the Industrial Revolution. It is the first of a trilogy, and the third novel will offer the ultimate utopian vision.
You can look at the current nightmare and despair. You ask: “how do ever get the government out of our lives?” Reformulate your question: “how do we restore freedom in America?” It may seem a trivial point, but the first question is akin to: “how do we get the cockroaches out of our kitchen?” It’s a valid question, and the cockroaches have to be eradicated, but it’s mundane and uninspiring. Restoring freedom, on the other hand, inspires, and freedom’s proponents aren’t left just pointing out the deleterious consequences of statism and coercion (even, or especially, for the so-called beneficiaries), but can instead frame the issues in terms of people building better lives for themselves and their families, unobstructed by the state, reaping their just rewards, and rediscovering respect for themselves and their fellow citizens. People need to strive for higher goals than cockroach eradication. (Even that task sounds more palatable if you reformulate it is a part of the job of making your kitchen sparkling clean.)
If we Gulchers frame our goal as restoring freedom, then that can be done in ways large and small. Realize that like all corrupt, overreaching, overextended, overly indebted governments, ours will fail. A big part of our job will be done, but if all we can offer is: “told you so, told you so,” it will not matter. Winston Churchill said, “You can always count on Americans to do the right thing—after they’ve tried everything else.” After the collapse, many Americans will be ready to try the right thing: restoring freedom. The government will be bankrupt and continuation of the welfare state and foreign adventurism will be fiscally impossible. But intellectual revolutions always precede actual revolutions, so it is now that we must make the case not just against current arrangements, but the positive case for restoring freedom, in every way that we can. That’s what leaders do.
Thoughts?
One realization that has come to me, far slower than it should have, is that it is not enough to be against statism and government, one has to be for something, to have a vision of where one wants to go. The Fountainhead sounds the tocsin against the encroaching state, and Atlas Shrugged painted the dystopian future after that encroaching state has smothered everything in its path. However, Rand never presented a vision of a world in which the things she was fighting for—liberty, limited government, rational self-interest, and capitalism—had triumphed. One of the reasons I wrote The Golden Pinnacle, which you read, Ed, is to, if not show a world where those ideals had triumphed, to at least show what America was like when we approached the pinnacle of freedom during the Industrial Revolution. It is the first of a trilogy, and the third novel will offer the ultimate utopian vision.
You can look at the current nightmare and despair. You ask: “how do ever get the government out of our lives?” Reformulate your question: “how do we restore freedom in America?” It may seem a trivial point, but the first question is akin to: “how do we get the cockroaches out of our kitchen?” It’s a valid question, and the cockroaches have to be eradicated, but it’s mundane and uninspiring. Restoring freedom, on the other hand, inspires, and freedom’s proponents aren’t left just pointing out the deleterious consequences of statism and coercion (even, or especially, for the so-called beneficiaries), but can instead frame the issues in terms of people building better lives for themselves and their families, unobstructed by the state, reaping their just rewards, and rediscovering respect for themselves and their fellow citizens. People need to strive for higher goals than cockroach eradication. (Even that task sounds more palatable if you reformulate it is a part of the job of making your kitchen sparkling clean.)
If we Gulchers frame our goal as restoring freedom, then that can be done in ways large and small. Realize that like all corrupt, overreaching, overextended, overly indebted governments, ours will fail. A big part of our job will be done, but if all we can offer is: “told you so, told you so,” it will not matter. Winston Churchill said, “You can always count on Americans to do the right thing—after they’ve tried everything else.” After the collapse, many Americans will be ready to try the right thing: restoring freedom. The government will be bankrupt and continuation of the welfare state and foreign adventurism will be fiscally impossible. But intellectual revolutions always precede actual revolutions, so it is now that we must make the case not just against current arrangements, but the positive case for restoring freedom, in every way that we can. That’s what leaders do.
Thoughts?
Previous comments... You are currently on page 2.
In the Navy we got "liberty" but we certainly were not free.
In AS, Galt's Gulch was, if not that ideal society, then the nucleus of one. Specifically it was a large camp where the most productive of men could live apart from the government that made true living impossible.
Months ago I at least conceived of a multi-commodity money system. I sought to replace fractional-reserve banking and trading in debt, with trading with coin (all precious metals allowed), and scrip backed with specific quantities of named commodities. Any merchant would be free to hawk his wares for any commodity he needed either to make them or to support his daily living.
Imagine being able to trade unrefined petroleum directly for refined motor or jet fuel, wheat (or corn) for bread, or silver for any electronic device that needs silver to make. That's just for starters.
Rand assumed putting gold and silver in people's hands would be enough. I propose a wider selection of commodities, to avoid a repeat of the "cross-of-gold" situation that ultimately gave way to the Federal Reserve.
http://bjp.rcpsych.org/content/182/1/5.f...
http://www.neulaw.org/blog/1050-neulaw-b...
http://medicalxpress.com/news/2011-11-ps...
Jan
I would like to point out that blacks were slaves for a few hundred years; women have operated under the abovementioned restrictions for thousands of years ('how many thousand' depends on the part of the world). But women's condition was 'spun' to a positive image - so it couldn't be wrong, could it?
And women got the right to vote 50 years after blacks did.
Jan, the elephantess in the room
I think that Straightline has an excellent point, which you have just supported. Many people tend to phrase their philosophy in terms of "don't stand under my umbrella", which leads to the list of unpleasant adjectives you cite. We need to increasingly phrase our philosophy as a "You believe in freedom? Y'all are welcome!" approach. We are our own worst PR agents.
Jan
I think the Constitution should stay out of education. I think that an amendment that says, "All laws passed in the US at any level must be Constitutional." is essential.
Jan
Jan
Jan
including the supreme court, shall make no law
or regulation abridging the voluntary choices
of the citizens, except as is mutually and
unanimously agreed between the Speaker
of the House, the president and the Chief
Justice, to violate the constitutional rights
of *other* citizens.
how about that amendment? -- j
p.s. all federal laws and regulations are
to be reviewed within two years and reinstated
thusly, else they are revoked.
p.p.s. Yes, the Gulch was the beginning
of the ideal society, in my view.
Answer, he owns himself.
But in relativism, society decides what is right and wrong, even if it is wrong.
Did unalienable, natural, civil, societal or god given rights include slavery? That depended on if “society thought” the rights of masters to have slaves should be respected. History shows they were. Even today there is slavery. Using these subjective rights can mean, and does mean, well, nearly anything, depending on the current “mood of society.” Most everywhere, full slavery is currently wrong, again. But one day, using relativism, “society” may make it right, again.
For individuals that respect individual rights, slavery is always wrong and never right, period.
you are as right as rain. you could leave; i.e. live on a sail boat, I have done it; once you leave the dock money is un-necessary. and as for the crash; I think it has actually taken place but those in Washington do not care about the nation only them selves and for fixing it they do not have a clue if they even think about it which I doubt. the aftermath will be war in the streets like it is throughout the rest of the world.
In addition, our educational system (preferably private) must teach financial and economic literacy, so the average person, to be considered educated, will be able to avoid the nonsense that triggered the meltdown a few years ago.
1.) Leave. But there is only one final frontier. And as of right now, Mars isn't worth colonizing. (Working to solve this).
2.) Crash. You can't beat these people at their own game. They wrote the rules. They've perfected it over thousands of years. The entire system must crash before it's fixed. And even then, there's no guarantee that you'll win in the aftermath.
Load more comments...