Dr. Francis Boyle: Wuhan Coronavirus is an Offensive Biological Warfare Weapon
Posted by freedomforall 4 years, 2 months ago to Science
"Dr. Francis Boyle discusses the coronavirus outbreak in Wuhan, China and the Biosafety Level 4 laboratory (BSL-4) from which he believes the infectious disease escaped. He believes the virus is potentially lethal and an offensive biological warfare weapon or dual-use biowarfare weapons agent genetically modified with gain of function properties, which is why the Chinese government originally tried to cover it up and is now taking drastic measures to contain it. The Wuhan BSL-4 lab is also a specially designated World Health Organization (WHO) research lab and Dr. Boyle contends that the WHO knows full well what is occurring."
SOURCE URL: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TsyujjitOFM
https://www.taiwannews.com.tw/en/news...
AMeador's comments on this being a less deadly test could be accurate, too.
https://gisanddata.maps.arcgis.com/ap...
It will fail just like Russian collusion.Just like Quid pro Quo failed. Like All the assasination attempts on the duly elected President. But Like the rear view mirror says criminal indictments are closer than they appear.
Dr. Francis Boyle: Wuhan Coronavirus is an Offensive Biological Warfare Weapon video is also hosted at this link:
https://www.brighteon.com/0a618138-58...
https://www.taiwannews.com.tw/en/news...
2/3 20
2/4 25
2/5 45
2/6 86
2/7 25
2/7 has a new category "Others" showing 61
(I have saved images of the Johns Hopkins official reports each day.)
ZeroHedge apparently had it's Twitter account suspended for circulating a message related to Dr. Boyle's "conspiracy theory."
Interesting that WHO is asking the U.S. (and presumably other industrialized nations) to put up $675 million to fix the results of what looks like the CCP's own faulty, backfiring, biological experimentation and probable unconfessed weapons development. https://news.un.org/en/story/2020/02/...
No surprise then that WHO was the last 'official' source to confirm the viral outbreak.
The 'fix' is the usual one-
give me a lot of money that I can spend to protect you.
The Chinese intentionally use government favoritism via cheap loans and monopolies to undercut prices internationally - aside from their own currency manipulations. This has a far greater effect than anything the US does with its currency - which affects all business partners and foreign nations equally.
If we were on the gold standard still, we would have run low on gold and our currency would have cheapened- making chinese prices in terms of the US dollar rise to the point there wouldnt be this huge price disparity between made in the USA and made in China.
But our illustrious government printed all this money in order to hide the inflation they were making and sent it overseas to china. The chinese hoard it, keeping inflation low here in the USA.
Its sad what has been done, and its our own fault. Hopefully, Trump will help fix it. The real fix is to stop inflation, and then to encourage people here to stop buying from china.
Again, see my comments regarding China's currency manipulations and government-sponsored hanky-panky. While its easy to look at the US' own policies, one can not exclude China's own price fixing or one gets a distorted picture (of a distorted picture).
Would I personally support a policy of zero inflation? Yes. Would I support a hard currency backing to reverse the 1964 move? YES. But those should not be confused with the current currency manipulations going on on both sides.
"The real fix is to stop inflation, and then to encourage people here to stop buying from china."
100% agree!
First, I'm pretty sure that already exists but second, doesn't that kind of go against getting the government involved in the first place? If you're going to make this a moral argument, it kind of seems like a cop-out to then argue the need for the heavy hand of government to intervene and force the matter...
I'm not opposed to playing tit-for-tat with the Chinese on trade issues, the problem is that China isn't our only trade partner - even if they are the largest. When we seek to get government involved in such deals, we open ourselves up for WTO disputes and recrimination by other nations as well - as well as ignoring our own focus on laissez-faire government.
I would also point out that "encouraging" automation via tax breaks has the unintended consequence of putting low-skill workers out of jobs and bringing on more calls for protectionism and higher minimum wages. From a strategic perspective, I think its a short-sighted approach.
https://www.dailywire.com/news/chines...
What if - as Dr. Boyle states - it was stolen from a US facility and then manipulated in a China bio war facility.
Might have heard it here first from me a while back. This is the big one...
It's not that I believe automation to be inherently evil (I'm a programmer so its my lifeblood) but the lack of entry-level jobs in the economy is a danger to the economy as a whole. I believe one of the most critical values a person can have is solid work ethic, and delaying the entry into the workforce due to hiring restrictions, minimum wage laws, and other bureaucracy only impresses upon people how beholden they are to government and conditions them to this slavery.
Buying from china has hidden the inflation for a while now, with more and more being bought from china at a LOT lower prices than if the same stuff were made in the USA. Now, if people bought american, we would see the massive inflation appear that was made in the past and hidden by the moving of production overseas, and the effect of whatever robotics and automation that we have enjoyed over here.
If only the government would stay out of it, the market could fix this.
I think our only OUT at this point is for a renewed push to reduce the cost of automation and robotics to keep prices low. I agree that leaves entry level people. especially entitled and lazy american workers, with no jobs.
The collectivists have gotten us all in a real catch 22 situation from which there is no way to escape the results of collectivism. They spend, print money cause they cant tax enough, create inflation, and then try to hide the inflation, then artificially force companies to increase wages, and therefore decrease employment.