

- Navigation
- Hot
- New
- Recent Comments
- Activity Feed
- Marketplace
- Members Directory
- Producer's Lounge
- Producer's Vault
- The Gulch: Live! (New)
- Ask the Gulch!
- Going Galt
- Books
- Business
- Classifieds
- Culture
- Economics
- Education
- Entertainment
- Government
- History
- Humor
- Legislation
- Movies
- News
- Philosophy
- Pics
- Politics
- Science
- Technology
- Video
- The Gulch: Best of
- The Gulch: Bugs
- The Gulch: Feature Requests
- The Gulch: Featured Producers
- The Gulch: General
- The Gulch: Introductions
- The Gulch: Local
- The Gulch: Promotions
Previous comments... You are currently on page 5.
Winning converts is a battle for where one places one's energies with respect to an end goal. Without that happy ending or vision, the story isn't effective at generating the internal energy necessary to overcome cultural inertia. Show me that happy ending and you have identified the key to proselytizing Objectivism. The next step is to put that key up against what other philosophies and religions are offering and see how it compares - not from the eyes of an Objectivist but from a view of the end goal and what it offers. I'm going to be somewhat tongue-in-cheek: what does Objectivism offer in contrast to 72 virgins? Reincarnation? Becoming "one" with the universe? Being "saved?" This is entirely a rhetorical question.
--
Does the "common Joe" see opportunity in a collapse? I'd argue that evidence from the 1930's argues against that - especially when the government is doing their utmost to keep screwing things up. We saw the same thing again in 2008-2016 under Democrats. Producers (not the "common Joe" I would add) simply sat on their money and waited until Trump got elected to invest. The rest simply had to deal with the mess - they certainly didn't have the power to change it.
I think Rand's vision here in Atlas Shrugged is 100% accurate - you can't look to the "common" people. You need a leader to step up, present a vision, and get people behind that vision. That's what Galt is trying to get Dagny to realize - that while she is incredibly competent within her profession, her vision of a productive and effective railroad system for Taggart is being completely undermined by her brother's vision and superior position of authority in the company - especially coupled with destructive government policies.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VeFNg...
[sarcasm]
The Galt type is superhuman. Readon, and Dagny, are flesh and blood. Very clever, hardworking, ethical, and maybe conservative in that opinions they hold outside areas of expertise and experience do change but only after anguish. Most readers will admire Galt but few will identify. Most readers will identify with Readon and Dagny, if we are not quite up there in all the positive attributes they are role models. The reader knows enough about Readon to have confidence that setbacks are dealt with- in work, play or love.
When tyranny collapses "common Joe" is not expecting quick happiness, jobs and prosperity but does see opportunity.
Ford , Rockefeller ,Carnegie , Guggenheim have sought to destroy Americas rugged individualism .They had taken over the Education system Generally speaking and have sought to control the diplomatic Corp. Norman Dodd exposed it.
Here is a link to his transcript. http://www.supremelaw.org/authors/dod...
It would be pretty unbelievable if we hadn’t lived through the results. This is his video if you want to hear it from the horses mouth.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8irQi...
Personally, given how Reardon gets dumped by Dagny in favor of Galt, I can't think of any reason why someone (especially a male) would see Reardon as the primary hero in the book to emulate. Sure Reardon came up with a cool metal, but Galt has a generator which everyone - including Reardon - has to depend on. AND Galt gets the girl! Where's the happy ending for Reardon?
I didn't, at the start, necessarily see myself as a great productive person.
Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs. You think people who are miserable and scraping just to survive are going to be praying for the return of some nebulous voice - who didn't even offer encouragement to them? No. And this is why I point out the lack of a happy ending.
That leads to intellectual laziness in reasoning.
Load more comments...