UK national Health Service to deny care for “racists or sexists”

Posted by Dobrien 5 years, 8 months ago to History
64 comments | Share | Flag

I imagine when filling out all the paperwork before an appointment you will have to give passwords to social media accounts.
Of course this is extremely subjective. I suppose
George Sorass and his “angels” will have a moving bar for this. It will only be used on those opposing his flood of African and Mid eastern infiltrators as an example.
The problem here of course is that the definition of what constitutes ‘racism’ or ‘sexism’ gets broader with each passing day.

As Jack Montgomery highlights, “In late 2017 an NHS female patient who requested a female nurse to carry out a cervical smear complained when the hospital sent a person with “an obviously male appearance… close-cropped hair, a male facial appearance and voice, large number of tattoos and facial stubble” who insisted “My gender is not male. I’m a transsexual”.
https://youtu.be/f2GA6o6E7hk


All Comments


Previous comments...   You are currently on page 2.
  • Posted by 5 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I am very thankful for Trump. He is the enemy of these deep state collectivists. He is the only effective defense from these destroyers we have had in my 62 years.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 5 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    It is no wonder why we are experiencing an epidemic of massive proportions of mental illness.
    The over use of anti-depressants to cure people of what in many cases is cognitive dissonance. That is living in a society that forces individuals to deny there own common sense. It is often subtly done by changing the definition of words. In example Diversity is good. Diversity simply means a range of different things or1 : the condition of having or being composed of differing elements : variety . How can that be good or bad? A diverse mix of blood donors is good for a community’s blood supply . Because those in need require a certain type of blood for a transfusion. Yet if you mix that diverse group of donors blood and transfuse a patient . It can be fatal as the individual immune response will Split or kill the red blood cells creating debris in the veins and vessels. The end result of this mass of signals is activation of the membrane attack complex, which rips cells apart. Meanwhile, spilled platelets from the blood cells can trigger an "uncontrollable clotting cascade," causing blood to clot in the veins. This cascade, called an acute hemolytic transfusion reaction, is what can kill people. That diversity is bad.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ jdg 5 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    So you never speak with anyone about a third person who is present?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ jdg 5 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    It's like Kafka: if anyone ever gets close to understanding all the rules they will change them. The only reason they pretend to follow any rules at all is to string along those of us who still believe in the Rule of Law, and are naive enough to expect them to follow it, which they will not.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ jdg 5 years, 8 months ago
    This sounds like grounds for an appeal based on human rights that could overturn NHS' existence, or at least its monopoly. I hope so.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Abaco 5 years, 8 months ago
    Meanwhile they cover up all of those high-position individuals who enjoyed Epstein's bevy of victims. See how that works?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Pecuniology 5 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Even slyer, who is most likely to say something that is 'racist' or 'sexist'? Why, that would be the old and the mentally unstable.

    What a very, very convenient way to justify passively euthanizing the unproductive and the undesirable!

    It's pretty clever, until you give it a name. Then, it is horrifying.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Pecuniology 5 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    That would be the logical conclusion of all this mindrot. Use they as an all-purpose singular pronoun and a brazillion gender variations on i and you.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by LibertyBelle 5 years, 8 months ago
    So they are going to deny people the care in a public institution, for which they have paid taxes, on the basis of their views? And where is freedom of conscience in all that? I'm just glad that's not in the U.S. (At least, not yet. Give it a few more months.)
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by exceller 5 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    They are working on replacing "you" with gender specific pronouns. You better learn those in case HR gets you in trouble.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by exceller 5 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Exact definitions.

    All you need to do is come up with fiction, treat it as law of rule and persecute those you decide are not adhering to it.

    What better way to kill those you don't like: gov run health care system is a great way to enforce it.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by chad 5 years, 8 months ago
    Any one who is for liberty or objectivism is automatically a sexist racist and is therefore culled from the society because of lack of medical care ensuring the loving kindness of communism to ensure a utopian culture in which mankind can exist! Why would anyone complain?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by bsmith51 5 years, 8 months ago
    Hitler marginalized, attacked and killed the Jews and others who were "undesirables" to him. It was a "final solution" that was very messy.

    Given the subtlety of the whole politically correct movement, the self guilt, self-censorship, self-hatred, I wonder if the goal of liberals is to get people to capitulate and kill themselves. It's certainly less messy that way.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by bsmith51 5 years, 8 months ago
    Remember that Obama said it was not possible for a white person NOT to be a racist because, whether he treated blacks kindly or harshly, he did so knowing he was doing so from a position of power.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ allosaur 5 years, 8 months ago
    Me dino would never go to the UK due to it apparently having more crazy people than here in the grand ole'~~~uh, uh, uh~~~well, at least here in Alabama.
    Nevertheless, if me dino was standing on a London sidewalk telling a transgender person it had a mental problem and it cut me wide open, I suppose I'd bleed to death as long as the transgender person stood there pointed down at me and screamed, "Sexist!"
    Come to think of it in the UK (and some as warped places in the USA), I suppose I'd deserve to be cut wide open (since Brits carry knives, not guns) and refused medical care for my opting to say "it" instead of "he" or "she" in PC opposition to the biological reality.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ blarman 5 years, 8 months ago
    This is why it is so important to protect the right to expression of thought. The most dangerous tyranny is the tyranny of the mind punishable by the death of the dissenter.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Pecuniology 5 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    "First, do no harm" ended just before physicians started chemically sterilizing and mutilating the genitals of children.
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo