Are these data presented at "climate" conferences?
I was fully aware of the false nature of the Al Gore Armageddon hysteria but good to see how it was done.
The starting point where any normal person should get suspicious at the data is that the graphs pertain to different time periods. Everyone with even a cursory familiarity of scientific data presentation is fully aware that the baseline must not change otherwise the comparison is between apples and hand grenades.
I am also fully aware the media will never show any interest in that. Bombast is what carries the day.
I realize you posted this under "Humor" not "Science" but considering the implications it should have been posted under "Propaganda" - there should be a category for that.
I have not been studying scientific publications written by these charlatans, only aware of some of the major omissions/manipulations that have been brought to light by credible scientists. Also, I have a few books elucidating real facts not "models" that these crooks use coming up with the "hockey stick" theory, for example.
A summary like the one shown above is a true eye opener even for those who are not versed in the principles of scientific research.
Are these data presented at "climate" conferences?
I was fully aware of the false nature of the Al Gore Armageddon hysteria but good to see how it was done.
The starting point where any normal person should get suspicious at the data is that the graphs pertain to different time periods. Everyone with even a cursory familiarity of scientific data presentation is fully aware that the baseline must not change otherwise the comparison is between apples and hand grenades.
I am also fully aware the media will never show any interest in that. Bombast is what carries the day.
I realize you posted this under "Humor" not "Science" but considering the implications it should have been posted under "Propaganda" - there should be a category for that.
I'm wondering if these climate change "scientists" know that... ;)
A summary like the one shown above is a true eye opener even for those who are not versed in the principles of scientific research.