The angry child, got it. She and Hogg would make quite the pair, with not an ounce of brain between them.

Greta Thunberg- aka Whingeberg the annoying ranting brat and climate strike leader.

The 16yo in pigtails who claims that world leaders (at least the old white males) who have not taken enough action on something she calls the climate crisis have “stolen my dreams and my childhood” and “People are suffering. People are dying. Entire ecosystems are collapsing."
and so on with snarls.
There are photos of Greta wearing an antifa shirt.

?

Well said actually

By the way AJA, Greta wears an antifa shirt.

Term2, I do not have religion but I do have faith. We've known eachother long enough to know that I am not a dupe, a fool or someone who blindly follows anything without question. Where we differ is a matter if perception on certain matters but I'd think after all this time you'd know that we have far more in common than not.

Thanks, term2.

And even those are all just separate front groups for the same failed policy directives...

This is why the cultivate the brown shirts. Generationally and nationality, only the title changes: brown shirt, black shirt, occupy, antifa, etc. I'm sure there are dozens more.

The whole basis of “religion” is also a blind and unsubstantiated acceptance of “beliefs”. I agree with your comment actually.

Leftists can't make a cogent argument so they have nothing left to do but to attempt to defame their opponents by taking their comments out of context. Without a red herring, they'd have nothing to say.

Absolutely not. Rational people are equals, neither predator nor prey. Any system that retains victims and victors is still operating on the animal level of evolution, eat or be eaten. Human intellect, rational consciousness, abstract thinking--becoming human--should take us to the next level. Say, Objectivist ethics.

Those positive values that some religions promote are not unique to religion. They coincidentally also embrace values practiced by secular groups in non-religious organizations and relationships. Any code of conduct that respects individuals' rights, even some of the ten commandments, will help to build good societies. That some religions preach self-sacrifice is not a recommendation of their values. It is not self-sacrifice to deal with others as equals, respecting their rights and not asking them to live for one's own sake. (Sound familiar?) Indulging in neither force nor fraud is not a religious tenet. But religion is collectivist dogma at best and a formula for exterminating non-believers at worst. Not good bedfellows.

I like that analogy.

Hilarious...oh sorry, can I laugh here? Yes! LMAO.
She is 100% correct...even Jim Jordan laughed because it is a charade.

Every conscious human knows it's not about the supremacy of one's skin color, it's about one's competence....and there is not a whole lot of that in DC.

I think Candace Owens is like Airwick in the Washington sewer! She is lovely and intelligent.

Wow! She is a pistol!!! And an extremely educated and well spoken one, at that!!!

I could definitely see Candice Owens as our first Black Female President in the future, perhaps another 15-20 years. Right now she is exactly where she needs to be, getting exposure expressing the truths of her convictions.

I am actually upset that we PAY these congress people when they act so stupidly.

It would best if the argument for individualism wasnt based on irrational religion tenets. That said, at least for the rest of MY life (I am 74), if we can keep collectivism at bay even relying on religion, I will be in favor of people like Candace. I am NOT into any of the religions as a believer, although I will say that SOME of the things promoted by religions are actually quite rational (such as financial responsibility, family values, etc)

I dont have any black friends any more. The black race has been infected to a large degree with entitlement and gimme-gimme engendered by obama. Too bad.

I suppose its a good idea and necessary to rebuff these crazy claims made by the collectivists, but it is annoying to even have to do it. The collectivist arguments are so lame its ridiculous to combat them.

She believes in freedom, like freedom of choice and freedom of speech. Reasoned and natural rights that are like kryptonite to the far left’s made-up narrative based ideology. Her religious views do muddle that a bit.

Ms. Owens is most impressive in being an intelligent, articulate, and passionate young woman, and I would add rational if it were not for her pro-life and Christian partisanship. It was good to hear her pro-capitalist statement. She is one to watch. I was especially captivated by her anti-hate views. It is a balancing act to be against hate without giving way to hating.

I love this woman, and the whole PragerU, except for the religious undercurrent. They do a great job communicating.

We should do something like this with our resources.