American photojournalist James Foley possibly beheaded by ISIS
Posted by Non_mooching_artist 10 years, 8 months ago to Video
This is disturbing in the extreme. These thugs are evil to their core. Their belief system in based in hatred, intolerance and cruelty. This is what we can expect more of because of the weak president we currently have in office.
Previous comments... You are currently on page 2.
1) One of the major tenets of true Christianity is "Peace on Earth, good will toward men".
2) When Jesus Christ was approached on a road by a Pharisee, he was asked the trick question about the legality of paying the Roman tax. His famous answer was to give unto Caesar that which is Caesar's and unto God that which is God's.
3) Just prior to His crucifixion, Jesus went into the desert to fast and pray. He was approached by Satan and offered all the kingdoms of the Earth for a single act of fealty. Recognizing a "Brooklyn Bridge" deal, He turned it down and told Satan to get lost.
4) Now, about three centuries after the death of Christ, those professing to be Christian were essentially offered the same deal and they took it. Christendom was born. They became Caesar and to this day many who claim to be Christian are really trying to be Caesar.
That is why I say Christendom and Christianity are not the same thing. There is no way Jesus Christ would have sanctioned the inquisition. A Caesar, on the other hand, wouldn't have a problem with it if it kept him in power. It would be even easier if he could call himself Christian and get away with it. Compared to the rest of Christendom, the founding fathers of the US were much closer to being true Christians and anti-Ceasar, which is reflected in the government they created. That is why I am of the opinion Western Civilization flourished the closer it got to its Christian root.
It is a good point that Japan made this mistake. Generally honor cultures have this idea of revenge that acts as a primitive criminal justice system. Suppose a criminal can kill someone, steal from him, and go to a distant place where it would be costly to locate him. If it weren't for revenge, he could feel safe knowing the family wouldn't put large time and effort going after the thief with no hope of recovering any of the stolen wealth. But he knows he would feel the need for revenge, a need that would overpower a cost/benefit analysis. So this discourages the criminal from committing the crime. It's a poor substitute for a criminal justice system, but it's what we had before law was invented and in places where rule of law has broken down.
All that is my reason why I think the perpetrators knew there would be a desire for revenge. They either a) want to use the revenge reaction to goad us into some action, b) want to get attention and recognition as a serious enemy and not band of thugs, or c) they're sadistic exhibitionists.
I doubt they hoped to scare people into inaction, but your example of Japan is a powerful example of country with a strong honor culture trying to do just that.
But perhaps you are too rational. Are you sure that they realize what the US knee-jerk response to this is likely to be? (I will point out that the Japanese, a bright folk, did not guess correctly re Pearl Harbor.) I would suggest that one of the factors operating here is that the terrorists do not realize how big the world is.
Let me give you an example: When I was in Basic Training in the AF, I found lots of airmen from the Midwest who really thought that 'most of the world was Christian, used forks, and spoke English'. I had them earnestly tell me this. If people with TV's and newspapers are that insular, then perhaps fanatics in the ME really think that they are tough and that we will be frightened.
Or...you could be entirely correct and they are sadistic exhibitionists.
Jan
I think we should have some sort of formal well-regulated militia for this reason.
The problem with this strategy is that there is a subset of humanity (genetic drift at work) that reacts with anger rather than submission."
Given the last part, I don't think the goal was intimidation. The militants don't have the military power to fight a major power, but they can commit ghastly crimes to get attention and to goad their enemies into rash actions. My wild guess is this either a) attention getting or b) serial-killer type bad guys using a religious / political cause as a fig leaf.
Isn't the inquisition what we got the last time a major state was Christian? So it seems to me as you move closer to a religion-based state, you get ISIS and the inquisition. When you move toward the state not establishing a religion, you get the US and all the countries with similar govt's that appeared after.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dXmMQJMF...
Jan, who had thought that she could not be any more aghast at the idiosyncrasies of religion...
Load more comments...