If Objectivism is not Pragmatic, of what use it it?
Some have asserted strict and sterile terms for being in-line with Objectivism, very philosophically consistent.
Others have asserted practical actions and decisions, that are clearly in their self-interest, and do not compel others.
Is Objectivism just an abstract concept, like higher mathematics, theoretical physics and various philosophies, or is Objectivism a practical manner to conduct basic decision making?
I'll provide an analogy...because I like them, not an a basic for argument, but as a means of communication:
Judo is both a sport and a martial art. I've practiced it since I was 15 yrs old. One can readily find sport-only practitioners, that will take action in matches that are complete failures in martial arts. (arching one's back to land on their shoulders to avoid points scored when thrown...and landing on your head/shoulders). There are many examples, and people will take strong positions on each side.
Others have asserted practical actions and decisions, that are clearly in their self-interest, and do not compel others.
Is Objectivism just an abstract concept, like higher mathematics, theoretical physics and various philosophies, or is Objectivism a practical manner to conduct basic decision making?
I'll provide an analogy...because I like them, not an a basic for argument, but as a means of communication:
Judo is both a sport and a martial art. I've practiced it since I was 15 yrs old. One can readily find sport-only practitioners, that will take action in matches that are complete failures in martial arts. (arching one's back to land on their shoulders to avoid points scored when thrown...and landing on your head/shoulders). There are many examples, and people will take strong positions on each side.
