Recent Comments
- 26Posted by mccannon01 2 days, 6 hours ago to IN THE MEME TYME 1/19/26 EDITION: WARSExcellent synopsis in meme form, OUC. Thank you for posting! I've been noticing a lot lately the phrase "what's going on with white liberal women?" or words to the same effect. I've been thinking this is not a new phenomenon as thousands of years ago the ancients recorded it in a book called "Genesis" where Satan recruited Eve first.
- 27Posted by mccannon01 2 days, 6 hours ago to IN THE MEME TYME SUNDAY PAPER EDITION 1/18/2026Lower case here works for me!
- 28Daffy's comment spot on !
- 29Sometimes one wonders if they are following the script. It's uncanny!
Remember something many years ago where, what a call the "Deletes" were playing out parts of the Bible prophecy for some unseen gain over society.
Wish I could remember more of that. - 30Me dino thinks maybe just maybe it's a worthy gamble to take on Iran protestors as refugee migrants.
Maybe not, since an infiltrator obeying the Quran may find a way to kill thousands by blowing up New York buildings. Or something along those lines.
Those six trannies sure are ugly for grotesque sights. Especially the beard with hairless boob cleavage.
First time I saw a tranny, I was working the back gate tower at a Alabama state prison during the late Nineties.
My sally port officer helped a sheriff's deputy escort a county inmate to the restroom in the walkthrough area of the tower.
The handcuffed darling wore a dangling full beard and a precious pink dress. My sally port officer was laughing. I could not help but to bust out laughing too.
Wish Fox News would not so repeatedly show Tampon Tim and the Mayor Frey mouth off about ICE being the Gestapo. That immediately sends me channel surfing every time. - 31. . . and it all started with the war on language as they sought to confound everything within creation that has made life worth living . . .
- 32Atlas Shrugged now non-fiction!
- 33Very sad news. Not all that surprising either.
As for Muslims in the USA, I've said it before, I'll say it again and I'll keep on saying it~~They all simply don't belong here and need to be deported as a safety issue. I could shrink "Muslims" down to "practicing Muslims" but Islam preaches that their Allah for a god approves of both lying to and killing all unbelievers.
Yeah, I spelled that god lower-cased like I would for Zeus or Odin. - 34Posted by mccannon01 3 days ago to IN THE MEME TYME SUNDAY PAPER EDITION 1/18/2026I hear you, dino. I'm right now listening to a radio (FOX News Radio) interview with a retired general (Keene?) and he is saying the Iranian regime is already bringing in Islamic militia from Afghanistan (Taliban) and Pakistan to brutally quell the protests and the killing of protesters has really continued in spite of Trump's warnings. I wouldn't expect much from the US Main Stream Marxist Media. It makes me wonder how many Islamic fighters crossed into the US over the past 5 years or so.
- 35Posted by dave42 3 days ago to The Fountainhead on AMC right nowAtlas Shrugged is on CNN right now.
- 36"~~unless it was a government office."
THAT made me dino laugh. - 37I've been having a day by day uncomfortable growing feeling about what you think the Iranian people may not be able to do.
I think Trump should have blown up a building containing certain pseudo-religious poisonously pious for clinging to power people in it yesterday.
No, the day before yesterday, Or maybe the day before that. - 38Posted by freedomforall 3 days, 2 hours ago to IN THE MEME TYME SUNDAY PAPER EDITION 1/18/2026I think the Creators Syndicate comic (copying Scott Adams) has the gender of the "boss" completely wrong - unless the office is that of a bureaucrat.
I've never heard any heterosexual male supervisor speak such utter bullshit unless it was a government office. - 39Posted by mccannon01 3 days, 5 hours ago to Bye Bye Public Broadcasting!On a phone try scrolling all the way to the bottom of the thread and find the "desktop version" selection and click on it to put the conversation in order. Then turn the phone sideways and expand the view. This works for me.
- 40Posted by mccannon01 3 days, 5 hours ago to The Fountainhead on AMC right nowThank you!
- 41Posted by mccannon01 3 days, 6 hours ago to IN THE MEME TYME SUNDAY PAPER EDITION 1/18/2026Serious stuff, indeed. RIP Scott Adams. I'm not sure the free thinking Iranian people are numerous and strong enough to break the regime, but they seem to be giving it a go.
- 42Having seen last December for channel surfing only a part of Violent Night on SYFY about a very violent Santa Claus as a good guy fighting bad guys, the second meme has inspired me dino to invent a Santa for the Islam religion.
The bearded goon runs (and is losing) the government of Iran. Each Halloween Santa Claws rides a sleigh pulled by giant bats to bomb Trick n' Treaters with lumps of coal.
He tries to laugh "Ho! Ho! Ho!" but can only squeal a high-pitched "Bwahahaha!" - 43Posted by CaptainKirk 3 days, 19 hours ago to Bye Bye Public Broadcasting!Okay, but what happens when Piracy Changes from "Collecting a Ransom" To Crippling a country?
Let's assume China and the USA have a COMPLETE falling out.
China imports about 75% of the FUEL and their FOOD (Peter Ziehan).
How easy/hard does it become to just SINK every ship carrying food or oil, headed for China?
BTW, I bring this scenario up, SPECIFICALLY because it highlights WHAT I BELIEVE is Trumps plan on Greenland through S. America. We are going to get cut off from the rest of the world. Because the Globalists would rather have WWIII with NUKES than give up their chance to control EVERY country in the world.
We are CLEARLY moving in this direction (hence the TSMC Chip Making in AZ), Greenland, Venezuela, etc.
For basic Piracy... I stand corrected (Thank you).
But for pre-war crippling of our enemies or perceived enemies.
Big ships are BIG Targets. Pipelines are (as we've seen) easy targets. - 44Posted by CaptainKirk 3 days, 19 hours ago to Bye Bye Public Broadcasting!Well, divide and conquer.
Trump has to help SOME of their pawns...
While targeting some of their stronger pieces.
I could be wrong, but I believe he is doing this for US.
Trump is in a TOUGH spot. Do you RELEASE the Epstein stuff BEFORE you figure out "Who is using it, and how, against WHOM?" (He clearly used it to remove the Ambassador from England)
It's easy to tell us what "WE" would do or should do... When we have NONE of the extra information Trump has. Some good, some bad (clearly).
Celebrate his wins. Pray for his soul, and give him space to "Shake The Box" - 45Seeing the wanton destruction by those that reviled Wynand's The Banner for standing up for Roark reminded me of Minneapolis.
- 46both very different but very well one
- 47Always love watching ...I listen to Roark's speech in my car all the time lol
- 48Posted by TheRealBill 3 days, 21 hours ago to Bye Bye Public Broadcasting!Your assumptions do not include history. Modern piracy has always been limited- long before today’s navy. Even in the heyday of piracy it was still a fraction of what Hollywood has glamorized it as.
Drones don’t really change much. For one, consider the primary barriers to piracy I mentioned. Drones don’t remove the height problem for boarding. They also don’t do much about armed guards. Nor do they change the economics of piracy or shipping.
Piracy is economically limited. The limited infrastructure and economic network access of piracy are a significant choke point and one of the drivers of it’s limited spread. Surely you don’t think drones will let Somali or Houthi pirates swarm out into the ocean lanes between China and the US West coast, do you?
From economics to geography piracy wouldn’t expand if the US had smaller warships. Indeed a single frigate, even a coastal guard one, suppresses piracy over a large area. This is because of the requirements for piracy. Piracy is fundamentally a poverty trap exploitation business that exists in the narrow overlap of failed states + shipping chokepoints + desperate populations. It’s not a scalable threat to global shipping architecture.
While the US’ navy does perform counter-piracy operations, it isn’t with the big warships and the USN isn’t even a majority player there. Indeed fact no nation does.
When it comes to ships, since that is core among your premises, the USN doesn’t assign ships on anything other than opportunistic cases, unlike other nations that assign ships on a dedicated basis. Even considering the opportunistic uses, the USN provides between five and ten percent of the ships used in counter-piracy. Where the US does lead is in command and control infrastructure and leadership.
Most remain unaware that there are several multinational organizations that handle counter piracy. Mostly because if the media reported on that and how successful it has been, it would be less fear inducing.
The primary ship classes (which are not exactly uniform across countries, but close enough for this discussion) used in active counter piracy operations are frigates in the 3-5k displacement range. One of the reasons these and smaller dominate is the cost of deployment, which is also why nations rotate patrols between them. Sometimes a destroyer class is deployed.
Another reason is that frigates hit a sweet spot in task capability. Helicopters are crucial and frigates provide that. The frigate provides longer range “warning shots” and sensor range, while the helicopters provide rapid response that pirate skiffs cannot outrun outmaneuver. Helicopters are the primary method to counter high freeboard levels because you drop down to the ship instead of climbing. In order for pirates to expand and target the big ships with a high freeboard, they would need to field frigate class ships with helicopters. And that is incredibly expensive, prohibitively so.
Consider this: today I could buy a small ocean going vessel from which I could launch pirate operations and deploy to the Gulf. I mean that literally - the ship is in the zone of 200k. But the cost of operations in logistics blows that out of the water, if you will. Then where would I get revenue from? Most piracy is really more of a hostage situation where the ship is ransomed back. Why? Because where an I going to offload that cargo in the Gulf area? It just isn’t viable in the gulf with or without big USN ships.
I understand your reasoning, but the premises it uses are simply incorrect and the opposite of the reality. The premise that we have giant shipping ships because of the USN stopping pirates is demonstrably false as I have shown. The premise that snakes and faster cargo ships are more pirate resistant is not only false but the inverse of the case. The fact that piracy only occurs in limited areas that have specific features needed for piracy, and that outside of those areas there is already limited to no counter piracy operations demonstrates that your premise that absent the big US navy ships piracy would expand is also false.
Drones don’t fix any of those premises. They don’t eliminate or reduce the regional requirements, the cost of operations, or the physics of boarding. - 49Sorry, was doing this from my phone, and I have trouble following comments there.
- 50Posted by TheRealBill 3 days, 22 hours ago to Bye Bye Public Broadcasting!Perhaps you replied to the wrong comment. I have no idea what position you’re talking about for I have made no assertion resembling what you stated.