This is where O's and atheists in general get it wrong - " It’s not an unchosen burden, as ethical systems based on duty or altruism are."

I was brought up a catholic, but as I matured and was able to reason for myself, the "burden" as described was not one that was "unchosen," as Mr. Cohen implies. In fact, there is no "burden" at all, at least not anymore than an O or atheist assumes as a member of a society. I do not live for another, but for myself. The fact that I choose a moral code that guides me, and I believe will deliver me eternal salvation and ever-lasting life, yet does not call for me to behave any differently than other moral humans that are rational and compassionate.

I am not compelled to impoverish myself in order to give what I have to others. I am only asked to examine the blessings that I have and to look upon those not so fortunate and to lend a helping hand. We have a sister parish in Uganda which provides services and training. I have "purchased" a piglet that was used by a family to raise and breed and raise more piglets that are grown for food and to sell. This has elevated the lifestyle for that family. And it cost me less than a dinner out at a restaurant. I was not guilted into the donation, rather I was presented the awareness and opportunity to help a fellow human being (family).

I do not behave morally as some "slavery" to a deity, rather as the right way to live my life. The fact that doing so results in eternal salvation is a bonus, but not the cause of my behavior.