Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by UncommonSense 10 years ago
    Here's my message to the United Communists: screw off. You lead the way and refuse to eat, kill yourselves off for the benefit of 'the masses' & leave me the hell alone.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by MattFranke 10 years ago
    I think everyone at the UN should practice safe sex, and go f*$& themselves!!
    I've said it before about the anti-human enviro-zombies that are always asking for everybody to do, or not to do, something for the planet; lead by example and go off yourselves. I would recommend a rope, as it would be reusable and sustainable. Pffft.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by CWhitneyR 10 years ago
    Here's an unintended consequence:
    1. We all eat less
    2. Government encourages farmers to harvest less food.
    3. We all die of starvation.
    Oh, wait. That's not an unintended consequence, is it?
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by Zenphamy 10 years ago
    Media and government keep calling the IPCC document a report. It is not. It was a political document written by the non=-scientist before the IPCC study was finished and caused many of the findings altered to match.

    This nonsense makes me nauseous. That'll cause me to eat less, so I guess they're getting what they want.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Stormi 10 years ago
    The UN does not give a flying fig about climate, it is a scheme to CONTROL people. The are commies, and they are using the same tactics Hitler used and Russians used. We believed Gorbachev's green lies, and they are using them big time. They want to rewild the farm lands so what food is available is permitted by the UN. They want to take control of all land, and thus make it impossible for people to hunt or seek food on their own. They want refrigeration done away with, thus no food storage, just your daily rations, as in Glenn Beck's novel "Agenda 21" - fiction becomes truth. Not only the immediate, but jobs will be gone when electricity is rationed and corporations like Emerson Climate Technologies, will be put out of business, when their product is no allowed. Farmers will have no income. Industry after industry will not be able to function. They have said that shots to prevent reproduction will be given, and only those with permits will be allowed to forgo the shots. This is all UN control crap, and we are in their cross hairs. I can think of no real good the UN does. Can anyone explain how mosquito nets for the beds in Africa protect them during the day? Mosquitoes do not just bite at night. These do gooders fall for all pseudo science the UN puts out, which is based on what they need to write to scare people. You can bet they will have heat when they shut down coal production.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by jbrown314 10 years ago
    UN has never been more meaningful, you are UNable to take them seriously. If we were to disband the UN it would eliminate a lot of hot air from all the bull-sh1t they release and save a lot of money! Global warming is similar to when the value of pi was changed in Indiana. No logic or factual support...
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by teri-amborn 10 years ago
    If the winters get any longer or colder wher I live, not only will we have no growing season for the veggie lovers to grow our food BUT we won't have money left from heating bills to purchase food. All I have to say is : "C'mon GLOBAL WARMING!".
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden by post owner or admin, or due to low comment or member score. View Comment
  • Posted by $ Maphesdus 10 years ago
    While eating less meat is without a doubt a healthier way to live, trying to impose it via government legislation is a very, very bad idea. There's no way a small group of intellectual elites sitting in an ivory tower could ever calculate the nutritional needs of the entire population. There are simply too many factors that come into play. The only way to ensure that everyone gets exactly what they need is to just let them have the freedom to go out and get it for themselves. Does that mean some people will make bad decisions? Yes it does. But it also means we will avoid the inevitable catastrophe of government denying people the ability to make the decisions which are right for them on an individual level.

    "If people let the government decide what foods they eat and what medicines they take, their bodies will soon be in as sorry a state as are the souls who live under tyranny."
    ~ Thomas Jefferson

    http://www.healthfreedom.info/Jefferson%...
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by freedomforall 10 years ago
      And it isn't proven to be less healthy.
      Eating less fast food is probably closer to proven.
      I'm with you on free choice. That means lots of experimentation and competitive results, and ultimately better information for those who become informed.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by wiggys 10 years ago
    i would like to be a fly on the wall when these idiots get together to write the reports. they probably put their hands in the air grabbing for the "facts" to put in the reports. when we are a third world planet they will be happy.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by Ranter 10 years ago
    Let's see - to reduce greenhouse gases we would have to eat more food raw, eat no beans, broccoli, cabbage, brussells sprouts, lentils, and other crops that require fertilizer and produce methane when digested. Further, we would have to reduce dramatically our use of grains and cereals, which means no more grain-fed cattle, no more ethanol in our fuel. We would have to adopt a diet primarily of wild game.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by 10 years ago
      from an evolutionary point of view, the reason why humans cook food is to start the digestive process so your digestion doesn't have to work as hard-which means more net calories out of stuff. It's why we have smaller stomachs today. Also, cooking kills germs. The supposed nutritional benefits of not cooking your food are more than outweighed by the risks of e coli, salmonella, and other germs/parasites.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by CircuitGuy 10 years ago
    The idea is to eat less meat b/c animals have to consume so many calories of farmed plants to give us one calorie of meat. This does not apply to meat from animals that don't eat farmed food.

    Rather than consuming less of it, though, I think we should be looking for ways to make more of it but with less cruelty and environmental impact.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by Kath 10 years ago
      Well said! Too many people assume that since I am a capitalist it must mean I believe it is fine to abuse animals and the land. I patiently have to explain that I am the consistent one. Be kind to all.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo