Man Made Climate Change--It's For Real

Posted by hrymzk 10 years ago to The Gulch: General
5 comments | Share | Best of... | Flag


AAAS "What We Know" 3/14
Position Statement Am Assn for the Advancement of Science.
Basic professional organization of American Scientists
97% Scientists acknowledge Climate Change is Man Made
http://whatweknow.aaas.org/

UN-IPCC 4/13/14
http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/h...

And the Practical consequences? Rise in the Price of Beef 4/13/14
http://www.kfbk.com/articles/kfbk-news-4...

US generates greatest CO2 emissions. 45% of Electricity is from Coal-Fired Plants

Climate Dynamics Research Report Using Historical Data going back to 1500
99.9% Probability Climate Change is Man Made
McGill Univ Shaun Lovejoy 4/13/14
http://www.ibtimes.com/there-99-chance-c...

Proof US Clean Air Act Improved Atmosphere Research Result Univ of Washington 4/13/14
http://www.techtimes.com/articles/5519/2...

We only have one SpaceShip Earth. Better safe than sorry later.
For our children and childrens’ children

Harry M


Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by khalling 10 years ago
    I'm going to take on the "better safe than sorry later" argument. Life is not a zero sum game. It is not science to postulate that we should DO SOMETHING NOW without having all the facts. what are ALL of your opportunity costs? Is it possible you are making things worse with your "solution?" Your feelings on this issue have no bearing in evidence. Your cites are specious. Agenda driven-not logic and reason and not science. The CO2 debate for one. H2O is a much larger "greenhouse gas" than CO2. all scientific evidence shows that CO2 increases AFTER there is an increase in whole world temperature. Most likely the result of oceans warming due to increase of global temps. CO2 is less soluble in water at higher temps. the Earth climate has changed from hotter to warmer thousands if not millions of times. Not one global warming model can explain changes occurring 10k years ago. they ignore that and bead in on human activity regardless of the overall data. They start with a self fulfilling prophesy and they LIE about the data. Many of these lies have been well documented and discussed on this site
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by dbhalling 10 years ago
    How AGW Advocates Have Lied

    “The latest data released by the Met Office, based on readings from 30,000 measuring stations, confirms there has been no global warming for 15 years.” http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-...

    It is well known that the main driver of the temperature on Earth are the variations in the amount of solar energy the Earth receives. “Experiments at the CERN laboratory in Geneva have supported the theory of Danish physicist Henrik Svensmark that the sun — not man-made CO2 — is the biggest driver of climate change.” http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-...

    The biggest greenhouse gas is water vapor – over 95%, but you never hear about this from AGW advocates. http://www.creators.com/opinion/walter-w...

    “Natural wetlands produce more greenhouse gas contributions annually than all human sources combined.” http://www.creators.com/opinion/walter-w...



    Below, IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change -UN) Experts comment on the IPCC, which is the group at the UN that has been saying a consensus of scientist s “believe” in Global Warming http://ukipscotland.wordpress.com/2011/1...

    Dr Vincent Gray: “The (IPCC) climate change statement is an orchestrated litany of lies.”

    Dr. Lucka Bogataj: “Rising levels of airborne carbon dioxide don’t cause global temperatures to rise…. temperature changed first and some 700 years later a change in aerial content of carbon dioxide followed.”

    Dr Richard Courtney: “The empirical evidence strongly indicates that the anthropogenic global warming hypothesis is wrong.”

    Dr Eigil Friis-Christensen: “The IPCC refused to consider the sun’s effect on the Earth’s climate as a topic worthy of investigation. The IPCC conceived its task only as investigating potential human causes of climate change.”

    Goal of AGW

    The goal of AGW is to kill capitalism and as a result kill millions of people. Patrick Moore, a co-founder of Greenpeace explained. (Environmentalism today is) more about globalism and anti-capitalism than it is about science or ecology….

    “Ultimately, no problem may be more threatening to the Earth’s environment than the proliferation of the human species.”
    — Anastasia Toufexis, “Overpopulation: Too Many Mouths,” article in Time’s special “Planet of the Year” edition, January 2, 1989. http://newsbusters.org/blogs/geoffrey-di...

    “Today, life on Earth is disappearing faster than the days when dinosaurs breathed their last, but for a very different reason….Us homo sapiens are turning out to be as destructive a force as any asteroid. Earth’s intricate web of ecosystems thrived for millions of years as natural paradises, until we came along, paved paradise, and put up a parking lot. Our assault on nature is killing off the very things we depend on for our own lives….The stark reality is that there are simply too many of us, and we consume way too much, especially here at home….It will take a massive global effort to make things right, but the solutions are not a secret: control population, recycle, reduce consumption, develop green technologies.”
    — NBC’s Matt Lauer hosting Countdown to Doomsday, a two-hour June 14, 2006 Sci-Fi Channel special. http://newsbusters.org/blogs/geoffrey-di...
    “My own doubts came when DDT was introduced. In Guyana, within two years, it had almost eliminated malaria. So my chief quarrel with DDT, in hindsight, is that it has greatly added to the population problem.” http://jiminmontana.wordpress.com/2012/0...



    Dr. Charles Wurster, one of the major opponents of DDT, is reported to have said,

    “People are the cause of all the problems. We have too many of them. We need to get rid of some of them, and this (referring to malaria deaths) is as good a way as any.” http://jiminmontana.wordpress.com/2012/0...



    “A total population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels, would be ideal,” Turner stated in 1996.[1]

    A leading environmentalist, Dr. Eric R. Pianka advocated the elimination of 90 percent of Earth’s population by airborne Ebola in front of few hundred members of the Texas Academy of Science who rose to their feet, and gave him a standing ovation.[2] Dr. Pianka attempted to deny this, but the evidence was overwhelming including his student evaluations.





    Environmentalism is a Religion – and that religion is anti-human and EVIL
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by 10 years ago

    dbhalling’s reply to my post about Climate Change—Man Made is:
    “Environmentalism is a Religion – and that religion is anti-human and EVIL”
    My original post noted current Scientific research results.
    The height of Rand is rationality/thinking. Scientific research is the
    preeminent example of such processes.
    dbhalling shows only basic reading incomprehension with the
    statement that Environmentalism is religion

    khalling needs to learn how to read also. All the Scientific warnings
    are about CO2 emissions.

    Harry M
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by Rozar 10 years ago
    Whether it's man made or not, solve your problems using your voice and reason like an adult. Don't rely on the government to come in with its guns and force people to obey. If your case holds water the free market will make it happen.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo