We need a little connection to Objectivism here...so I'll say hooray for science and reason!! (I'm also an aerospace engineer, aka rocket scientist, so I have extra appreciation for this.) We could have a discussion about the ethics of funding sources...which probably won't have much debate. Nothing about NASA's charter about defending individual rights, running courts, or defending the country.
This is great exploration of knowledge to me! To think that Pluto is relatively new and geologically active despite being way too far away from any major tidal or heat source to prolong such is fascinating. As the NASA scientist said, this is going to make a lot of people rethink their theories about planetary development and geological development. That's what science is about - adjusting the theories to fit the data and not the other way around.
Pluto and its largest moon Charon can be regarded as a double planet system that orbit the barycenter which lies outside the surfaces of both bodies. They also appear to be rotationally locked in that the same face of each constantly faces the other body. This is significant from the perspective of heating by tidal force friction. An example is the Earth Moon system. The moon is rotationally locked but the Earth is not this results in tidal heating of the Earth but not the Moon. Pluto's other satellites are not massive enough to cause significant heating so the source of heat remains a mystery. It may be due to radio isotope decay deep in the planet but that remains to be seen.
Ever since I was a school boy back during the 50s, I've always wondered what Pluto actually looked like. Now I have lived to see it! Ice mountains? How cool! Oops, that pun was not intended. LOL!
kids still learn about the planets? . I thought that they were now directed to learn about the stars instead -- the Kardashians, the Aljazeeras, the Sheens and the Alinskys. -- j .
Mixed feelings about projects like this. On the one hand it's a lot of tax money (ie OUR money) being spent, and there might be better ways to spend it (like paying down the debt).
On the other hand, I think the long-term survival of the human race is going to involve moving off this one rock, and eventually out of the solar system. If we last that long.
I wish the private space companies were showing more potential. I'd really like to see the moon and Mars colonized privately, but private companies operate on payback, and it's a lot of money to invest for a long period of time before that is even possible.
This may be a case of "if the government doesn't do it, it won't get done". Then we have to decide if we really want it bad enough.
Interesting and totally cool. One thing that needs to be resolved is whether or not Pluto is a "captured" entity or not.
It seems it lost it's planetary status recently because of it's unusual orbit suggesting it was not part of the evolved solar system. And yet, they are saying it is 4.5 billion years old, essentially that of earth and the solar system at 4.6 billion. How do they even know its age, if it might not be part of the original solar system?
My wife used to work in the Planetary Division of the USGS at Flagstaff, Az drawing airbrushed maps of quadrangles on Mars, and Jupiter's moons from the Voyager data. It was great attending some of the talks on the evolving thinking of planetary geology and origins. I can just hear them now going at it with all this new data.
Shared this article on FB. If they're going to yank my money away, I feel good knowing this is being done with it. I just wish that these guys were doing this privately.
I'm an OBJ so I don't support NASA as a gov't agency, but as far as extorted funds go, these aren't the most wasted. Oh, and the numbers I've seen say $700-some-odd million - not billions.
Philosophically, I agree that tax money should not go to NASA...but of all the extraneous agencies and uses to which my money is put, this is the one I least begrudge.
It's a gradual process, but I think space exploration will become more privatized and less socialized as time goes on. Space tourism and asteroid mining will lead the way.
But we do have a great reason for funding NASA, didn't you know? We have to use NASA to prop up anthropogenic climate change arguments and as a basis for Muslim outreach!
We could have a discussion about the ethics of funding sources...which probably won't have much debate. Nothing about NASA's charter about defending individual rights, running courts, or defending the country.
Now I have lived to see it!
Ice mountains? How cool!
Oops, that pun was not intended. LOL!
https://twitter.com/awstar11/status/6...
.
"When I was a kid, Pluto was a planet?"
I just love that!
directed to learn about the stars instead -- the Kardashians,
the Aljazeeras, the Sheens and the Alinskys. -- j
.
On the other hand, I think the long-term survival of the human race is going to involve moving off this one rock, and eventually out of the solar system. If we last that long.
I wish the private space companies were showing more potential. I'd really like to see the moon and Mars colonized privately, but private companies operate on payback, and it's a lot of money to invest for a long period of time before that is even possible.
This may be a case of "if the government doesn't do it, it won't get done". Then we have to decide if we really want it bad enough.
It seems it lost it's planetary status recently because of it's unusual orbit suggesting it was not part of the evolved solar system. And yet, they are saying it is 4.5 billion years old, essentially that of earth and the solar system at 4.6 billion. How do they even know its age, if it might not be part of the original solar system?
My wife used to work in the Planetary Division of the USGS at Flagstaff, Az drawing airbrushed maps of quadrangles on Mars, and Jupiter's moons from the Voyager data. It was great attending some of the talks on the evolving thinking of planetary geology and origins. I can just hear them now going at it with all this new data.
Did you see my previous post - it was a while back...
http://www.galtsgulchonline.com/posts...
Jan
Right now, any destination in space is like Antarctica -- except it's even more expensive, farther, AND more useless to go there.
How quickly would we shrug when Atlantis opens it's doors 300 miles straight up.
The future IS ours. We just live in the transition times.
Jan
It's important we not lose hope in these dark times.
And It's not pie-in-the-sky, either.
The human spirit IS indomitable. And truth She discovered will indeed set us free.
Jan
[/sarcasm]