We need to fight Political Correctness like Muslims and Jihad

Posted by woodlema 8 years, 9 months ago to Politics
5 comments | Share | Flag

Our country is moving more and more communist by the day and people are too afraid to point it out and call these people communists.

Khrushchev is reported to have said:

"We cannot expect the Americans to jump from capitalism to communism, but we can assist their elected leaders in giving Americans small doses of socialism, until they suddenly awake to find they have communism."

Well here we are. Obamacare, (Socialism), Politically Correct (Communism), Removal of Religious Freedoms, (Communism), we are ever so close to the Russia of Regan's day how did we get here.

BY GOOD MEN DOING NOTHING!!! Which is all it takes Evil to succeed.
SOURCE URL: http://www.academia.org/the-origins-of-political-correctness/


Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by broskjold22 8 years, 9 months ago
    Thanks for posting this. And thanks, woodlema, for the exposition of the tactics. To add: First, it is important to recognize that PC is a doomed philosophy. There are outlets of free speech even in our present day where dissenters raise their voices against the cultural Marxist derivative called PC. One such outlet is comedy, where performers of all political stripes are able to give voice to their views, and, more important, to criticize nonsense. That said, most of us heard Jerry Seinfeld say he will no longer perform on college campuses. Seinfeld is a comic legend and even after all he has earned, PC culture prevents him from delivering his brilliant punch lines to an audience. In fact, he said something to the tune of "they [the college students] don't know what the f--- they are talking about". So I do not want to deny the issue as backwater conservatives might be apt to do. Instead, let's consider the fact that Cultural Marxism seeks to take individuals, group them into several packages (by race, gender, sexual orientation, etc.), and then to encourage individuals "belonging" to those groups to define themselves as one of the group or groups. This allows the PC elite to define movements and causes for these groups and the individuals composing them, occupying their thinking minds. Then, when enough of these groups get together, you will see that their hatred is directed toward the conservatives, who often hold somewhat right views for completely wrong reasons (i.e. religious or Platonic intrinsicism). That is our current stage. But soon enough, the conservatives will be reformed into a populist PC group (its happening now). Then there will be one group left: the Capitalists. Now the entire populace besides the capitalists, according to cultural Marxism, defines itself as belonging not only to the original group (based on race, sex, sexual orientation), it will define itself as fundamentally in opposition to the capitalists, and a revolution will be ripe. That is what the Communists want to do, step by step.

    The reason PC focuses on groups based on basic criteria is because to belong, no work is necessary. Most of these are groups to which "membership" requires, well, nothing at all, besides the looting mentality. The reason is the ugly disguise of communism: that it wants to end literally all groups opposing it. Now, these opposing groups are often political or philosophical. Groups that are based on looting characteristics, but choice characteristics (and choice is to evade or to think/work). Only individuals can make choices. So, since the key defining aspect of the individual is rational thought, this should tell you what the cultural Marxists seek to eliminate.

    Cultural Marxism is Marxism, it uses any necessary means to overthrow the "group" it hates, the capitalists (a word which I use in the most admiring sense), and we have seen the methods used to perform this task. The key is, as woodlema indicates, to stop it from advancing at each stage. The key is to recognize that PC is a power ploy not a consistent ideology. Because its root is not rationality but rationalizations, backroom deals, blackmail, and threats. Proclaim your right to the trader principle, your right to trade value for value, your right to use your own mind, your right to your own life, your right not to be coerced with physical force. These principles resonate.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by broskjold22 8 years, 9 months ago
      Another comment. PC is an enabler to Jihad. Because PC dispenses with principles. For example, PC thinks that Jihad is the result of socio-economic factors. That the reason for the violence is religion (the opiate of the masses) whose root is scarcity of economic power. That if this group is given economic power, it will be satisfied and its violence and extremism will go away. Experience proves otherwise. The reason is that Jihad's scapegoat is not explicitly the capitalists, but the West, the Christians, the Jews, Israel. To win the fight against Jihad, the West needs to be Objective (i.e. the trader principle, not to use the initiation of force, etc.) Whether the West is up for the task given that PC (Marxism) is a persistent ideology is the debate we see played out each and every day. Because in a battle between PC and Jihad, well, moral compromise wins. And we all know who loses in that compromise: those who have more to lose. We see it happening literally all the time.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by 8 years, 9 months ago
        ISIS and Islam is a separate topic, and would be under the heading "WAR."

        General George Patton made it clear"

        "You do not win a war by dieing for your Country. You win by making the other poor bastard die for his."
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden by post owner or admin, or due to low comment or member score. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 8 years, 9 months ago
    War is rarely fair. If ever. Add to that his comments on preparing the battle field by changing the mindset of the opponents troops and supporters at home. PC is an example of the enemy doing exactly that to us. No pun intended the guy was a head of his time and remains in first place.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by 8 years, 9 months ago
    If you want toe beat the enemy you must first know yourself and KNOW YOUR ENEMY!!! And you will always be victorious. Sun Tsu

    Next you cannot fight your enemy with your hands tied behind your back.

    Next you MUST fight fire with fire, your enemy will NOT play fair.

    Next fight your enemy like they are 10 x tougher you, they just might be.

    Next our enemy uses "Rules for Radicals."

    If you want to WIN< you need to know their playbook and use THEIR rules to fight.

    The rules[1]

    1.“Power is not only what you have, but what the enemy thinks you have.” Power is derived from 2 main sources – money and people. “Have-Nots” must build power from flesh and blood.

    2.“Never go outside the expertise of your people.” It results in confusion, fear and retreat. Feeling secure adds to the backbone of anyone.

    3.“Whenever possible, go outside the expertise of the enemy.” Look for ways to increase insecurity, anxiety and uncertainty.

    4.“Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules.” If the rule is that every letter gets a reply, send 30,000 letters. You can kill them with this because no one can possibly obey all of their own rules.

    5.“Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon.” There is no defense. It’s irrational. It’s infuriating. It also works as a key pressure point to force the enemy into concessions.

    6.“A good tactic is one your people enjoy.” They’ll keep doing it without urging and come back to do more. They’re doing their thing, and will even suggest better ones.

    7.“A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag.” Don’t become old news.

    8.“Keep the pressure on. Never let up.” Keep trying new things to keep the opposition off balance. As the opposition masters one approach, hit them from the flank with something new.

    9.“The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself.” Imagination and ego can dream up many more consequences than any activist.

    10."The major premise for tactics is the development of operations that will maintain a constant pressure upon the opposition." It is this unceasing pressure that results in the reactions from the opposition that are essential for the success of the campaign.

    11.“If you push a negative hard enough, it will push through and become a positive.” Violence from the other side can win the public to your side because the public sympathizes with the underdog.

    12.“The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative.” Never let the enemy score points because you’re caught without a solution to the problem.

    13.“Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.” Cut off the support network and isolate the target from sympathy. Go after people and not institutions; people hurt faster than institutions.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo