What? The Supreme Court may have gotten one right?
Any smackdown to the EPA is a positive note. This ruling says that the EPA may not simply dismiss costs when issuing rules.
This would be obvious for anyone actually running a business, but government bureaucracies don't have to live in the real world.
This would be obvious for anyone actually running a business, but government bureaucracies don't have to live in the real world.
Add Comment
All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read
- 1Posted by dbhalling 8 years, 9 months agoHear, hear. K and I heard about this while we were being interviewed. Of course, I doubt the supremes will hold the EPA to a very high standard on the accuracy of their cost analysis.| Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink
- 2Posted by $ blarman 8 years, 9 months agoGranted, but they standard they established was that they had to include a cost analysis on all of their proposed edicts. That right there is a big deal.| Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink
-
-
