13

K on The Radio Tonight

Posted by khalling 8 years, 10 months ago to Culture
26 comments | Share | Flag

Join me as I guest co-host "we Built That" blog talk radio tonight with Jack July. We're covering current events and what is an Objectivist :) 8pm EST-9PM EST
call in number: (914) 338-1458
stump K. see ya tonight!
SOURCE URL: http://www.blogtalkradio.com/webuiltthatnetwork/2015/06/12/current-events-day


Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by LetsShrug 8 years, 10 months ago
    Kh did an amazing job in this blog radio show thing and everybody should listen. You may have cracked open a new door to another media avenue
    ..way to work it!!! I want more!!!
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ minniepuck 8 years, 10 months ago
    I really liked it. It's funny to run the audio through my phone and sync it to the car while we run around town. My husband literally said, "Put on Kaila."

    I'm glad to hear about good book sales. I was also intrigued by the way you defined Objectivism. You did a great job breaking it down into manageable pieces where someone can start or fine-tune their understanding. Has there been a post like that recently where all of that was explained? I think it'd a great one.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by 8 years, 10 months ago
      haha. well, Jack and I had a great time. Here is a great chart:
      http://rebirthofreason.com/Objectivism10...

      and here is Rand's short description:

      Introducing Objectivism

      The following is a short description of Objectivism given by Ayn Rand in 1962:

      "At a sales conference at Random House, preceding the publication of Atlas Shrugged, one of the book salesmen asked me whether I could present the essence of my philosophy while standing on one foot. I did as follows:

      Metaphysics: Objective Reality
      Epistemology: Reason
      Ethics: Self-interest
      Politics: Capitalism
      If you want this translated into simple language, it would read: 1. “Nature, to be commanded, must be obeyed” or “Wishing won’t make it so.” 2. “You can’t eat your cake and have it, too.” 3. “Man is an end in himself.” 4. “Give me liberty or give me death.”

      If you held these concepts with total consistency, as the base of your convictions, you would have a full philosophical system to guide the course of your life. But to hold them with total consistency—to understand, to define, to prove and to apply them—requires volumes of thought. Which is why philosophy cannot be discussed while standing on one foot—nor while standing on two feet on both sides of every fence. This last is the predominant philosophical position today, particularly in the field of politics.

      My philosophy, Objectivism, holds that:

      Reality exists as an objective absolute—facts are facts, independent of man’s feelings, wishes, hopes or fears.

      Reason (the faculty which identifies and integrates the material provided by man’s senses) is man’s only means of perceiving reality, his only source of knowledge, his only guide to action, and his basic means of survival.

      Man—every man—is an end in himself, not the means to the ends of others. He must exist for his own sake, neither sacrificing himself to others nor sacrificing others to himself. The pursuit of his own rational self-interest and of his own happiness is the highest moral purpose of his life.

      The ideal political-economic system is laissez-faire capitalism. It is a system where men deal with one another, not as victims and executioners, nor as masters and slaves, but as traders, by free, voluntary exchange to mutual benefit. It is a system where no man may obtain any values from others by resorting to physical force, and no man may initiate the use of physical force against others. The government acts only as a policeman that protects man’s rights; it uses physical force only in retaliation and only against those who initiate its use, such as criminals or foreign invaders. In a system of full capitalism, there should be (but, historically, has not yet been) a complete separation of state and economics, in the same way and for the same reasons as the separation of state and church." source, Lexicon
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo