Glenn Beck suggests "all-out war"
ok. . home-grown terrorists acting in multiple
cities simultaneously. . ok. . worse than 2001.
ok. . prepare. . guess that we must. -- j
.
cities simultaneously. . ok. . worse than 2001.
ok. . prepare. . guess that we must. -- j
.
I'll shoot them at the range and then double what I have.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wNzfgl_H...
The range where I used to shoot my shotgun no longer accepts shotguns.
Nor am I a hunter and this is not hunting season.
Guess I could throw them away.
Indoor anges around here will allow slugs but not shot.
I have no intention to buy slugs, though slugs fired from long range (for a shotgun) were part of an annual NRA shotgun qualification I had to pass as a prison officer at least 21 times.
During my first year of 1982 I stopped a prison escape by firing a warning shot with a .30-.06 I had never fired before.
That was replaced soon by AR-15s they trained us to shoot (had prior M-16 military experience).
But my boasting digresses--
Before the range we're speaking of became a business instead of a place the City of Pleasant Grove had set up for their cops and the general public to shoot at, I qualified there one time for the Alabama DOC back around 1985. Only 5 minutes from my house!
Before that I had to drive an hour to another state prison before the range at the prison I worked at was completed.
It is when the criminals are government tyrants either foreign or DOMESTIC. :)
Of course the Liberals think our government tyrants are just benevolent leaders since they support statist causes.
Respectfully,
O.A.
No one in his/her right mind would truly want to engage in war with another country unless by doing so we were protecting our way of life, our liberties and the freedoms that we have fought and died for over the past 200 years. In any negotiation between countries with dramatic ideological differences, war or its possibility must always be on or close to the table.
We panic at the idea of 6 dead in a chopper crash or something, when we are probably going to see hundreds of thousands or millions die in the coming, inevitable conflict with extremists.
We also need to recognize who that enemy is, even Saudi Arabia and Egypt are taking the fight to the enemy at this point, and I say hurray! we gave them all the weapons but they still wanted us to fight their fellow-arabs for them. But ultimately, this is going to be WW3 in the middle east, and none of this is going to end until all the accounts are settled.
1.) The Palestinian "government" needs to be folded up, and pieces & parts redrawn to Jordan, Egypt, and Lebanon. I think that's the only security situation that Israel would agree to (and I don't blame them at all). Jerusalem needs to be 100% governed by Israel.
2.) Saudi, the US, NATO, Iraq, Syria, Russia, and Israel need to push out ISIL on every front, all-out-war, tactical nukes, whatever is needed. This needs to end. No 'taking prisoners', they need to be eliminated and remainders imprisoned or executed for crimes against humanity. We can do this on our own without any real trouble if we take the gloves off, but the importance is that stakeholders in the region are a part of the solution. As ugly as Europe was after WWII, the pieces & parts model worked pretty well to root-out fascism.
3.) Japan needs to re-enter the global military as a stabilizing force to the rise of China (and it is). We need to allow them to re-exert their military influence and it will rebuild their economy at the same time.
4.) Honestly, we need to abolish the UN.
This is why individual rights for protection are important. Maybe a few cases of individuals succeeding will turn around public opinion on gun control.
Jan, WBC
But I could easily see China becoming the dominant power in poor parts of the world, especially if we have an economic crisis and they don't. Their troops are already in Iraq, Nigeria, and Sudan. And we should probably withdraw from those places anyway, because we don't need the oil anymore. Let the Europeans or Japan fight China for control of Arab countries if they need the oil. It's not our problem.
Now if they moved into any place in the Americas, I might think differently. A Russian or Chinese base in Venezuela or Cuba could become a major threat to us.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D05T5HXP...
Jan
in several ways -- this is one, but there also is the
possibility of internal strife in several ways. . the
politicians might change their attitude if their lives
were threatened. . not by me, of course. -- j
.
.
So prep for the latter and you will be in a better situation with respect to the former.
Jan