HR 198 - To establish standards defining impeachable `high crimes and misdemeanors'

Posted by freedomforall 9 years ago to Legislation
7 comments | Share | Flag

HRES 198 IH

114th CONGRESS

1st Session

H. RES. 198

To establish standards defining impeachable `high crimes and misdemeanors' within the meaning of Article II, section 4 as applied to the President of the United States.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

April 13, 2015

Mr. YOHO submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

RESOLUTION

To establish standards defining impeachable `high crimes and misdemeanors' within the meaning of Article II, section 4 as applied to the President of the United States.

Whereas Article II, section 4 of the Constitution provides that, `The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors';

Whereas Article I, section 2, clause 5 provides that, `The House of Representatives . . . shall have the sole Power of Impeachment';

Whereas the constitutional convention rejected `neglect of duty' or `maladministration' as impeachment standards in favor of `high crimes and misdemeanors' because the former terms were too broad;

Whereas Alexander Hamilton in Federalist 65 explained that impeachable offenses `proceed from the misconduct of public men, or, in other words, from the abuse or violation of some public trust. They are of a nature which may with peculiar propriety be denominated POLITICAL, as they relate chiefly to injuries done immediately to the society itself';

Whereas impeachable `high crimes and misdemeanors' has an objective meaning based on the intent of the Constitution's framers and British impeachment precedents;

Whereas the House of Representatives has voted articles of impeachment against two Presidents, one Cabinet officer, one Senator, one Supreme Court Justice, and fourteen (14) Federal judges without providing a general standard for defining an impeachable offense;

Whereas the law should warn before it strikes;

Whereas the absence of impeachment standards creates an appearance that impeachment is a partisan exercise, which undermines its legitimacy and deters its use;

Whereas the impeachment power of the House of Representatives is a cornerstone safeguard against Presidential tyranny; and

Whereas the past neglect of the House of Representatives to use the impeachment power against Presidential usurpations and lawlessness has concentrated alarming power in the executive branch, crippled liberty, undermined transparency, and encouraged Presidents to further aggrandizements: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved,

SECTION 1. DEFINITION OF PRESIDENTIAL IMPEACHABLE OFFENSES.

The House of Representatives declares the following Presidential actions shall constitute impeachable `high crimes and misdemeanors' within the meaning of Article II, section 4, which will cause the House to vote an article or articles of impeachment to send to the Senate for trial--

(1) initiating war without express congressional authorization;

(2) killing American citizens in the United States or abroad who are not then engaged in active hostilities against the United States without due process (unless the killing was necessary to prevent imminent serious physical danger to third parties);

(3) failing to superintend subordinates guilty of chronic constitutional abuses;

(4) spending appropriated funds in violation of conditions imposed for expenditure;

(5) intentionally lying to Congress to obtain an authorization for war;

(6) failing to take care that the laws be faithfully executed through signing statements or systematic policies of nonenforcement;

(7) substituting executive agreements for treaties;

(8) intentionally lying under oath to a Federal judge or grand jury;

(9) misusing Federal agencies to advance a partisan political agenda;

(10) refusing to comply with a congressional subpoena for documents or testimony issued for a legitimate legislative purpose; and

(11) issuing Executive orders or Presidential memoranda that infringe upon or circumvent the constitutional powers of Congress.

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

This Resolution shall take effect upon passage by the House of Representatives.
SOURCE URL: http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c114:H.RES.198:


Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by SaltyDog 9 years ago
    For anyone supporting the notion of impeaching the current infestation of the White House, I have one question: How do the words "President Joe Biden, Leader of the Free World" sound to you?
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by 9 years ago
      Better than Obama, but a perfect example of why the founders designed the system for the candidate with the second highest vote total to be vice president, not some hand picked political appointee flunky. No unelected appointee should be in the early line of succession.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ WilliamShipley 9 years ago
    It's rather a meaningless gesture. Impeachment is a political, not a judicial, process. An impeachable offense is one that the House passes as a reason for a bill of impeachment.

    If the 2/3 of the Senate votes in the affirmative the President is removed from office.

    There is no judicial review or appeal. If the House votes to impeach because wearing a blue tie is considered a high crime and misdemeanor and the Senate after examining the facts votes 2/3 to convict, then it's impeachable.

    Declaring actions to be impeachable without actually starting an impeachment is just waving your arms around. And we know 2/3 of the Senate won't vote to convict on any of this so it's a waste of energy.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by 9 years ago
      I think the idea is that if there is a clear list of impeachable offences then it will be easier to make a case and bring pressure from the people. In addition, if this is a law and there are penalties added for non enforcement, it may have the effect of preventing the impeachable acts listed in the law. Naive? Very possibly.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo