12

Ted Cruz Just Disqualified Himself for President

Posted by $ nickursis 9 years ago to Politics
37 comments | Share | Flag

Now here is an excellent example of camoflauge being used to preach your politics. Mix Ted Cruz in and pontificate on all that the Obamanation has done so well, including his insane dealing with a sleazy arab collection of misfits in Iran (while calling for death to America BTW). A real piece of mystical ramblings on whatever the writer wanted to pontificate on. Yech...
SOURCE URL: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/daniel-r-depetris/ted-cruz-just-disqualified_b_6920102.html?ncid=txtlnkusaolp00000592


Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • 19
    Posted by Eudaimonia 9 years ago
    When Huffpo comes out against a candidate, I call that an endorsement.

    Thanks, Huffpo!
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by ewv 9 years ago
      The article alternates between accusing him of "extremism" and having integrity and principles without addressing what they are. Leftists, who don't dare acknowledge their sympathy with various brands of socialism, pretend they are "practical" with no political ideology -- they are Pragmatists whose only principle is to denounce all principles, while pretending that their collectivism and statism is not a political ideology.

      Read or re-read Ayn Rand's "'Extremism', Or the Art of Smearing" in CUI.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by $ DriveTrain 9 years ago
        Whenever I hear the "extremism" epithet, I hear someone who has absolutely no argument to present against a hated opponent, but who dimly senses that "He's a Great Big Gob of Greasy-Grimy Gopher-Guts" might be a little too obvious. Along with Rand's go-to article, I also point people to Jacksonian editorialist William Legget's piece in the June 3, 1837 issue of the "Plaindealer," titled "The Morals of Politics" - specifically, the last two paragraphs (his gaffe against "selfishness" notwithstanding.) The "Extremist! Nyah!" epithet has been in play for a long, long time, and hasn't improved with age. 8^]

        http://tinyurl.com/736873a

        Also, I am endlessly baffled as to why anyone outside of the insular, vestigial collectivist camp goes anywhere near the "Huffington Post" for any reason, ever. Do not feed the beast, even with so much as a single site hit. (That goes double for using Orwoogle as your search engine. I recommend switching to DuckDuckGo.com)
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ HarmonKaslow 9 years ago
    Ted Cruz is a world-class debate champion ... anyone with the courage to debate him face-to-face will eat their lunch. The man has an incredible brain to support his principles and beliefs ... not that you have to agree with them ... just know that he knows how to debate them.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ 9 years ago
      Harmon, he may well be a great debate person, but he lacks the credentials to get sufficient votes to win. The problem any non-democrat candidate will face is getting enough non republicans to vote for him. After last election, when a couple I know said they voted for Obama because Romney was a Mormon, I saw why the Dems keep in power. Divide and conquer.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by coaldigger 9 years ago
    When I start off reading a blog from someone that describes himself as "national security dude", my expectations are very low. I found nothing to raise my opinion in this article. When I read an opinion piece, I want to know why I should value the opinion of the author. My dog has an opinion and after a sniff, may or may not like Ted Cruz. I would give more credence to the sniff test than this.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by freedomforall 9 years ago
    "He doesn't appear to grasp the notion that dealing with the world requires skills beyond a passionate, bumper-sticker laced Senate floor speech riddled with the typical talking points. Nor does he appear to recognize that anyone who is fortunate enough to win the top job in the country needs to exhibit a set of characteristics that run polar opposite of Cruz's propensity for being reflexively dogmatic. As all presidents have learned throughout the Republic's history, being Commander-in-Chief often means being willing to cast aside ideology in order to keep Americans safe and serve the best interests of the country. "
    This hasn't stopped Obama's utter failure.
    Doing exactly the opposite worked well for Reagan.
    But facts don't concern imbecilic writers like the author.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by Ben_C 9 years ago
    Huffington Post drivel. Apparently the author knows little of WWII or Neville Chamberlain. And Obama had extensive government experience before entering the White House (by voting present most of the time)? To paraphrase Reagan, "tear down this bloated federal government Mr. Speaker."
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ jdg 9 years ago
    I get it now. Ted Cruz is Rand Paul's designated decoy. RP will now quietly stride forward to victory while Cruz does his job of letting HuffPo use him for a piƱata!

    Nice of you to take one for the team, Teddy boy!
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by samrigel 9 years ago
    Huffpo's delusional rantings. I thought everyone knew that drugs were evil for the mind! Even more shocking I didn't think any Conservative still read anything Huffpo puts out. They are not even worth bed time stories for the sheep in the field.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ allosaur 9 years ago
    I just read a libtard hit piece authored by what Rush Limbaugh calls "the drive-by media," who would love to see a rare Republican with a conservative spine go away.

    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by scojohnson 9 years ago
    HuffPo - I hit delete as soon as it popped up. i had to listen yo that kook for months when she ran for governor. Somehow with 2-3% of the vote, Ariana kept being "the third" in every debate sponsored by a media outlet.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden by post owner or admin, or due to low comment or member score. View Comment
  • Posted by AmericanGreatness 9 years ago
    This piece reminds me of a Cruz comment when asked what he thought about the NY Times chastising him.

    He responded that question by saying: "You mistakenly assume that the voters in Texas that elected to represent them care what the NY Times has to say."

    This pseudo intellectual makes the same mistake.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by DanShu 9 years ago
    Here it comes. The Left will be pouncing on Cruz like all get out. Not only that but the Progressive Republicans will be joining in.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ 9 years ago
      Which points out the real flaw in the system, there are democrats who are "conservative" and republicans who are "liberal", both seem a contradiction in terms. It decays into poolside politics where each party is broken into several smaller parties, and the only ones who benefit are? Thats what I have yet to figure out, it seems there is a missing piece of the puzzle.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by Matcha 9 years ago
    Wow. This is why I left the US. I don't think we can elect a principled person like Rand Paul or Ted Cruz. Nothing is going to change. We will get the Republican candidate they want us to have. Then we will lose again or get a Republican who is for the party not the people or Constitution. Why is it if a person talks about religion now they are treated like they are not worth being elected. I'm just saying I don't understand why it is such as issue. I promise you they will do the same thing to the Constitution. This just smacks of brainwashing.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ 9 years ago
      The vast majority of Americans couldn't care a hoot about who is President or any other office. They have become used to "Government". As long as there is "Government" everything will be ok. They don't vote on principle or logic, they vote on "values" "morals" "religion". That emotional voting allows manipulation and games, which cover up all the real manipulation. That is why only the "right" candidate will win, and the battle will be over which party can spen the most money to impress the masses with THEIR "rightness". Dems did it with "Change" the last 2 rounds, and the only thing that really changed is the incompetency level, prejudice, and total disregard for law that now has increased above the usual level. If Hillary wins it will escalate into a bigger, badder Empire than it is now. But if a Republican wins, I think it will just skew at the same level but to the opposit side. We can never win in this situation. I think that was why the Founders had all their secret ways to limit who could vote. Then they voted their own self interests which just happened to coincide with the country's.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by term2 9 years ago
    Huffington Post is an idiotic liberal piece of trash. I dont read anything they publish. Cruz is Cruz, and I dont need Huffington to tell me about him. He is deeply religious and owes allegiance to some "god" he things is all knowing. Unfortunately for him, I dont think his "god" IS all knowing.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by MinorLiberator 9 years ago
    I'm neither for Cruz or against him this early, but what I do agree on is that this is just the usual load of crap from The HuffPo. I'll wait for something slightly more objective.

    One thing I do find interesting, and this early it's just that, is that the MSM appears to be very afraid of Cruz, even while saying he has no chance.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ 9 years ago
      Good observation, and it also goes hand in hand with the whole opposite side cheer-leading for him. They should wait and see who all declares before skewering or cheering. I thought it was interesting that no sooner did Cruz declare, there are those labeling him dead. Power politics, the reason we have such sh@tty government.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by scojohnson 9 years ago
      I'd agree. Unfortunately, I agree with many of his general stances on freedom and liberty, but his delivery could use some significant improvement. As soon as he moves outside of the southern evangelical zone, he would be crushed.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by Genez 9 years ago
      Yes, it's definitely important to see which way the liberal media is blowing about someone like Cruz. There wholehearted bashing of him does have the ring of an endorsement in many ways!
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo