13

TSA Requires National ID For US Citizens To Travel Domestically

Posted by khalling 9 years, 2 months ago to Government
151 comments | Share | Flag

Plenty of Conservatives see no problem with this. Of course, this is another chain they put around your ankle tying you to your govt as its slave. People need fundamental philosophical bases for their politics. There is nothing free about this.
SOURCE URL: https://www.dollarvigilante.com/blog/2015/2/9/tsa-demands-internal-passport-for-domestic-travel.html


Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by Zenphamy 9 years, 2 months ago
    I'm old enough to remember my first SS card that had 'Not to be Used for ID' in red letters printed diagonally across the face of the card.

    Next up is DNA.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by Zenphamy 9 years, 2 months ago
    This is just more evidence that the true purpose of TSA has little to do with actual safety/security. What's happened with all the state votes against National ID and True ID made a few years ago?

    I really hate this crap!
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by ChuckyBob 9 years, 2 months ago
    As long as we have to act like WWII German citizens, we might as well change the TSA uniform to jack boots and brown shirts.
    Also, I used to work in the sea port industry. In order to maintain access to the port we had to get a Transportation Worker Identification Credential (TWIC) issued by TSA. This card had all kinds of secutity measures including a holographic background and a chip loaded with biometric info. Sounds secure, right? A few months after mine was issued the fed database crashed so that the feds could not verify anything (apparently they must have had some IRS computer techs on loan to the TSA. Backups? We don't need no stinking backups!) Anyway, when I flew, just for the fun of it I would show my TWIC when the TSA yahoo would ask for my papers. Half the time they (THE TSA EMPLOYEE) would not accept their own issued ID. The rest of the time they pretended to know what it was and let me through...theater at its worst.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by Mamaemma 9 years, 2 months ago
    Seig Heil!
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by 9 years, 2 months ago
      so, if someone accused you of Godwin's Law for making this statement, how would you respond?
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Comment hidden by post owner or admin, or due to low comment or member score. View Comment
      • Posted by Robbie53024 9 years, 2 months ago
        I think there's a difference here, in that the Nazi's actually used such means. It's not over the top if it is an example.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by 9 years, 2 months ago
          I was accused of being uncivil and not willing to have a "good" discussion. rocky is offended enough by this discussion to leave the gulch.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
          • Posted by $ winterwind 9 years, 2 months ago
            *italics, bold type WHAT!?! Would you be willing to provide the link to this discussion. If you, or many other Gulch Producers, have enemies, I have enemies, and I want to know who they are.
            Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
            • Posted by $ winterwind 9 years, 2 months ago
              I see below. hmmm.
              I don't think you were exaggerating or labeling. No, I can't name every conversation I have and every article I read in which Conservatives or Progressives said that they would be in favor of this or that. It doesn't mean I didn't read it or don't know it and add it to my general knowledge of the world today.
              and my "coin" often lands Conservative side up because they talk at the talk, and that's it. They say they are different from Progressives, and the only different is in how much tyranny they will support.
              Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by Mamaemma 9 years, 2 months ago
        Godwin's law doesn't apply. I was at the beginning of the discussion. Godwin's law says the longer the online discussion.............
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by $ jdg 9 years, 2 months ago
          ... the greater the probability that someone in it will compare his opponent to Nazis, thereby immediately losing the argument.

          I agree that Godwin's law doesn't apply, but only because nobody here has yet taken up TSA's side of the argument.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
          • Posted by 9 years, 2 months ago
            what actually happened to me (not mamemma's example) was I presented the article. I then received comments which were favorable for a National ID. the comments drifted into a surreal (my POV) discussion about whether your criminal records should be attached to the card (remember the card was supposed to start as a way of verifying birth certificates). I took issue with the cavalier way one of my liberties was being thrown under the bus was happening in the discussion. that brought a response of trashing the article calling it false, misleading, exaggerated. that's when I came back in and referenced examples of how these programs escalate and then why did an entire population of jews calmly agree with an entire German population to sew stars on their clothing. and that was that. one poster flew into a rage, moderation was called in and the decision was I had used Godwin's Law and ruined a perfectly interesting conversation. not much more was said after that. I posted supporting documentation for the article's veracity. no one else commented. post done. What I should have added was the point that the article lead with Nazi Germany-in that national IDs are singularly rare. and the modern examples are Nazi Germany and Cold War Russia.
            Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
          • Posted by dbhalling 9 years, 2 months ago
            The sad thing is so-called Godwin;s law is named after an anarcho-socialist. Why anyone would want to propagate his nonsense is beyond me. It is clearly an attempt to stifle debate and divert the conversation from the logic of the argument.
            Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by 9 years, 2 months ago
          well, you're parcing a bit. I didn't start with the argument although the article kind of lead with it. I waited until it got heated. what happened was, one member discredited the author with several statements. He missed clear points the author made. then I got frustrated. once conspiracy theory was brought up I was clear. how did Germany get so many people to be willing to comply? we already know that 10s of thousands maybe millions of illegal aliens will not go out of their way to comply with the new rules. but any citizen of the US who uses air travel will. now we set up up another mechanism to make you compliant. right now- you can fly within the US without a passport. but if I make you get another kind of passport" I take away your ability to travel and work perhaps. it's one additional way to hold something over your head for compliance. If you look in the comments section-people talked about some of the things we worry about-like FEMA taking charge during a disaster. well if I was thinking about controlling a population the quickest-giving FEMA more powers will be met with more resistance than tacking powers onto TSA. I am not trying to ratchet up fear here, just making a point. does it resonate? have govts ever used safety as a reason to gain more control?
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
          • Posted by IIGeo2 9 years, 2 months ago
            KHalling I appreciate your post and enjoy the thought provoking arguments made. Please read my commentary as they are based in law. Which can be changed but really not debated. The passport card is a good and easily verifed document. designed to ease traffic at a border and cut down on verbal false claims to US Citizenship. (the result was now we have an increase indocumented false claims meaning docs obtained by fraud, thats a slippery slope for any type of enforcement agency for sure) But keep posting I will keep reading and if we had a vote him to a "red tag" admin guy you have my vote sir, agree with you, disagree with you love you or hate you, you do bring the debate on so THANK you for your insights.
            Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
            • Posted by 9 years, 2 months ago
              IIGeo, I have a passport card. It is directly related to my passport. I have only ever showed it at the international border. Real ID is about domestic travel. the 4th Amendment is clear-the Federal govt may not ask me for papers if I am traveling between cities or states without a warrant. Drivers License's are different than "papers." we'll agree to disagree on what the Real ID is going to end up being. I do sympathize with border issues. thanks for your kind words, I'm a "she" :)
              Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
          • Posted by Mamaemma 9 years, 2 months ago
            Talk about compliant . Every time I stand in a TSA line, I get so mad I could scream. There we all stand in line, being treated like criminals, all guilty until proven innocent. And it's so stupid! So, yes, we Americans will comply, but what else can we do? I need to fly sometimes for work. But it makes me so mad!
            Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
            • Posted by NealS 9 years, 2 months ago
              That's specifically why I retired at age 59 at the end of 2001 (remember 9/11). Business travel requiring a flight was no longer any fun any more and I flew a lot. Now when we fly my wife gets quite angry (almost mad) at me because I make these sounds like sheep while standing in lines. Baaahh, baaaa, baahhaa. I've met a lot of people in these lines that don't have much of a sense of humor. Sometimes I tell them about how we've given up our freedom resulting in standing in these lines, sometimes not. The early retirement was scary but actually proved to be fantastic anyway. Teach your kids to save for their future.
              Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ PhoenixRising 9 years, 2 months ago
    ORIGIN OF ‘REAL ID’: The enhanced security measures stem from the passage of the REAL ID Act of 2005, a U.S. law enacted by President Bush that states that a Federal agency may not accept state-issued identification cards without complying with a number of enhanced standards of the REAL ID Act.
    http://www.policestateusa.com/2015/tsa-t...
    That's the "history" of the "Real ID." So, from the Referenced URL if you have a Driver's license that has a Bio-chip you already have a Real-ID and apparently most states except those listed in the article issue Real-ID's. States that are providing "Drivers Licenses" to Illegal's -- may be providing them the "power to vote." Obama's Executive Order which allows Illegal's to obtain legal status which allows them to obtain, among other items a Drivers License, may allow them an "ability to vote" -- even though they should not be allowed to vote.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by Ranter 9 years, 2 months ago
      Correct. I have a neighbor who is not a US citizen, but a permanent green card holder. When he got his Pennsylvania Driver's License, he somehow registered to vote. He has never voted, but he's on the rolls and doesn't know how to get himself off. Apparently, anyone applying for a driver's license can become a registered voter in PA.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by $ jdg 9 years, 2 months ago
        That's the Motor Voter law. Welfare departments now do the same thing -- and they're forbidden from excluding noncitizens or even illegals.

        Of course that doesn't mean non-citizens are supposed to be allowed to vote -- just that they're likely to be given the opportunity anyway.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by woodlema 9 years, 2 months ago
    When conservatives see no problem with this I am in great fear for our country.

    This also tells me that these conservatives have totally forsaken the Constitution and the spirit of this great country.

    Those who surrender freedom for security will not have, nor do they deserve, either one.”
    ― Benjamin Franklin

    AUTHOR: Benjamin Franklin (1706–90)
    QUOTATION: “Well, Doctor, what have we got—a Republic or a Monarchy?”

    “A Republic, if you can keep it.”
    ATTRIBUTION: The response is attributed to BENJAMIN FRANKLIN—at the close of the Constitutional Convention of 1787, when queried as he left Independence Hall on the final day of deliberation—in the notes of Dr. James McHenry, one of Maryland’s delegates to the Convention.

    McHenry’s notes were first published in The American Historical Review, vol. 11, 1906, and the anecdote on p. 618 reads: “A lady asked Dr. Franklin Well Doctor what have we got a republic or a monarchy. A republic replied the Doctor if you can keep it.” When McHenry’s notes were included in The Records of the Federal Convention of 1787, ed. Max Farrand, vol. 3, appendix A, p. 85 (1911, reprinted 1934), a footnote stated that the date this anecdote was written is uncertain.

    I fear our Republic has been lost, starting with Woodrow Wilson.

    Alexander Fraser Tytler, a European historian published The Decline and Fall of the Athenian Republic. In his publication, Tytler reported that from his research he had determined the following:

    "A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the voters discover they can vote themselves largesse from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates promising them the most benefits from the public treasury, with the result that a democracy always collapses over a loss of fiscal responsibility, always followed by a dictatorship. The average of the world's great civilizations before they decline has been 200 years. These nations have progressed in this sequence:
    From bondage to spiritual faith,
    From spiritual faith to great courage,
    From courage to liberty,
    From liberty to abundance,
    From abundance to selfishness,
    From selfishness to complacency,
    From complacency to apathy,
    From apathy to dependency,
    From dependency back again to bondage."

    We are at the stage of dependency now with more than 50% of this nation on some form of Government welfare. Conservatives giving up more freedoms for perceived security is placing us back in Bondage to the Government, and Tyrannical dictators.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ blarman 9 years, 2 months ago
    If they claim to be a conservative and can't see the problem in this, they haven't really thought about the problem enough to even call themselves conservatives, IMHO. More-like brain-washed sheeple (it does go both ways).

    One can not maintain freedom without thoughtful contemplation of proposed laws and the studious application of history. That is what made the Constitutional Conventions so valuable is that you had men there who were students of history and who were determined not to duplicate the mistakes of the past. I would even go so far as to label them real political scientists, because they were actually studying and formulating how government should work from examining the evidence of what had not.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden by post owner or admin, or due to low comment or member score. View Comment
  • Posted by Robbie53024 9 years, 2 months ago
    This is frightening. And with "illegals" increasingly obtaining now federally approved state drivers licenses, there will be no way to discern a citizen from a non-citizen.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by IIGeo2 9 years, 2 months ago
      Yes and no, on the subject of immigration the base of the Law assumes a lawful entry which is why Immigration officers do not randomly stop people. But on the rare occasion it does happen there is more evidence than the I have a hunch check.

      The issue is do we want to give the OJT trained TSA agent the Authority to check the legal status of persons traveling domestically? My answer is NO, because they can barely keep the lines moving now can you imagine the amount of time needed if they added the so where were you born and of what country are you a citizen of line of questioning?

      The problem is when we merged the various departments under one Customs and Border Protection agency they took on so many missions that they are now incapable really of doing any of them with any level of skill.

      Federally approved is a well no not so much, but the privacy issue will come ino affect when you have to put statements on the license which identifies the person as NOT being a Citizen or a lawful resident of the US now the state is complicit with aiding and abbetting any anyone who accepts the ID for the cashing of a paycheck is also guilty. This truly can become an out of control debate.

      But I agree with you this truely is a slippery slope.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by j_IR1776wg 9 years, 2 months ago
    "Of course, this is another chain they put around your ankle tying you to your govt as its slave." Well written k. Soon we'll all need permission to leave our (government-owned) homes every morning.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by Rocky_Road 9 years, 2 months ago
    "Plenty of Conservatives see no problem with this."

    There isn't a single reference in the article to either Conservatives and/or Republicans.
    Why do you make that inference, then?

    I suggest that the Progressives "see no problem with this", even though they aren't mentioned either. The article supports my statement just as much as yours.
    Just my humble opinion....
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by 9 years, 2 months ago
      I am in a FB group of Conservative/libertarians. Several there are vry bullish on a national ID. They see no problem with this and think I exaggerate potential or surety of abuse. the white star in the corner which your DL soon will have to have is chillingly evocative of some other stars certain people had to have. maybe this time it means "patriot"? I was accused of Godwin's Law. which I did invoke. I'd like people to wake up and understand when they cheerfully argue for the loss of my freedom in any capacity-I might not be civil.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Comment hidden by post owner or admin, or due to low comment or member score. View Comment
      • Posted by Robbie53024 9 years, 2 months ago
        Why are they bullish? I suspect it is because they and most of their acquaintances are legal US citizens, but see or know of the vast number of illegals. They think that if these illegals weren't able to travel, it would drive them out. The weakness in that train of thought is in thinking that the illegals wouldn't get these ID's. They will (and are!).
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by 9 years, 2 months ago
          I do not know. I thought some of teh Conservatives in the Gulch could help on this. My hunch is illegal aliens, voting without ID. but why wouldn't a DL suffice? safety issues. it's hard to stay all calm while people who you think are allies are making arguments to empower the feds
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
          • Comment hidden by post owner or admin, or due to low comment or member score. View Comment
          • Posted by Robbie53024 9 years, 2 months ago
            Same misguided notion that an all encompassing federal control is the best. Misguided at best and downright suicidal at worst. Many good meaning folks are misguided because they have never had to think of these things before - mostly because they had a gov't that was doing its proper role. Now that it isn't they are finding it difficult to think for themselves.
            Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
          • Posted by $ blarman 9 years, 2 months ago
            You can count me in. I'm against any kind of national ID (except passports explicitly for the purpose of FOREIGN travel). I'm against Federal government expansion of any kind.

            If you really want to go after the Christian conservatives and get them on your side, just tell them that the Real ID Act is in reality the mandatory application of the sign of the Beast (666). That'll get their goats ;)

            What you really need to do is ask these so-called conservatives if they align more with the Republican party or the Tea Party. That will give away where they stand.
            Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by $ jdg 9 years, 2 months ago
          I know enough illegals that I find such beliefs hilarious. Aside from their presence here (which is not a continuing crime, just one when they came in), illegals are more law abiding and consume less welfare spending than citizens. The numbers bear this out. And of course, those who intend to become legal via "anchor babies" (which is almost all of them) pay their taxes, too.

          Conservative enthusiasm for enforcing immigration laws is nothing but prejudice.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by Rocky_Road 9 years, 2 months ago
        " Several there are [very] bullish on a national ID."

        'Several' is just barely more than one, and a hell of a lot smaller than 'most'. You have made your disdain for Conservatives more than plain, and pick your words accordingly.

        Just my humble opinion.....
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by 9 years, 2 months ago
          well you're pissed at me now. sorry. wasn't my goal. I am genuinely upset that this kind of an issue-a national rallying point which would get tons of support and push back does not. this isn't the first time I've had this conversation with my conservative friends rocky. maybe they'd listen to you on this over me.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
          • Posted by freedomforall 9 years, 2 months ago
            They aren't conservatives. They are brainwashed to be neo fascists who claim to be conservatives because they haven't a clue. They are as bad as Democrats claiming to be "liberal". They just stole that previously admirable term to nullify the real traditional liberals. Same for the disgusting vermin that control the GOP.
            Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by dbhalling 9 years, 2 months ago
          Rocky it was never my intention to upset you either and I have to admit I am a bit confused. Is your position that you are for national ID card? or are you upset that you feel conservatives are being unfairly pinned to pushing the national ID card?
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Comment hidden by post owner or admin, or due to low comment or member score. View Comment
    • Posted by Robbie53024 9 years, 2 months ago
      The only thing that I can think is that kh believes that they should be against this - well, I do too. I'm not sure that anyone thinks that the progressives would be against this, so no need to point them out. Just my 2 cents.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by dbhalling 9 years, 2 months ago
      Sure they are two side of the same totalitarian coin. But the law and order republicans always want to say "if you have done nothing wrong, you have nothing to fear." Tell that to Gibson Guitars, or the people caught up in the IRS scandal. Wrong is a moral questions, not a legal question.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by Rocky_Road 9 years, 2 months ago
        My question was 'why does your two sided coin ALWAYS land Conservative side up?'

        Your 'nothing wrong, nothing to fear' is exactly what I hear from the Progressives I know...I have never heard it from my Republican friends.

        If that is your opinion, then state that. Don't infer that the article makes the same claim...because it doesn't.
        Just my humble opinion...! ;-)
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by dbhalling 9 years, 2 months ago
          We hear it on this site quite frequently. No I am not saying it is just conservatives, but with friends like this who needs enemies?
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
          • Posted by Rocky_Road 9 years, 2 months ago
            Boy, do you have a 'knack' for doubling down!
            First it was "Plenty of Conservatives see no problem with this."
            And now it is "We hear it on this site quite frequently."
            And the coup de grace: "...but with friends like this who needs enemies? "

            I see a perfect opportunity to leave this site...'of my own free will'. Consider it done!
            Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
            • Posted by dbhalling 9 years, 2 months ago
              Rocky do what you must, but you cannot deny that the NSA was expanded with conservative applause, or that conservatives push national ID cards just as much as regressives. The difference is that they say they are for freedom, while destroying it.
              Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
            • Posted by 9 years, 2 months ago
              rocky, we are just making an argument. we are not trying in any way to push Conservatives out-just those who support policies such as the national ID card to check their premises. I'm likely to offend EVERYONE on this site at least a couple of times, but why leave?
              Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ Abaco 9 years, 2 months ago
      I tend to think that a lot of people who label themselves as conservatives will go for this.

      Wasn't it the news lady Megan Kelly who recently said that sometimes you need a little big brother? (Fox News) The media sets the agenda, whether we like it or not. The Neocons have been leading us down the left trail like a bunch of blind hikers. They are typically pretty statist, IMO. Let's see how this develops...
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by Rocky_Road 9 years, 2 months ago
        I, as a Conservative, am tired of certain posters that have the opinion that the first thing that I do each morning, is to lace up my "law and order" jackboots.
        Any other Conservatives feel the 'jab'?

        Just my opinion....
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Comment hidden by post owner or admin, or due to low comment or member score. View Comment
        • Posted by Robbie53024 9 years, 2 months ago
          While I don't claim to be a "conservative" (I consider myself a Constitutional Iibertarian), I think that many believe that conservatives have no problem with limiting individual liberty. I think that they are wrong. The conservatives that support such measures do so out of some misguided idea that it will crack down on illegals. It won't.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
          • Posted by $ blarman 9 years, 2 months ago
            I consider myself a Tea Party Conservative, and I have a real problem with constrictions on my freedom. And I think that the majority of Conservatives got fed a lie with the so-called Patriot Act. There was stuff in there that was used as justification for all the rest - a smokescreen.

            I agree with you that the airlines ought to be responsible for their own screening and that if they were smart, they'd train their screeners just like the Israelis.
            Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
            • Posted by 9 years, 2 months ago
              while teh people I was talking with supported a national ID card, they did want to limit the scope of info the feds would attach to it. yea right. they were discussing procedural things like past criminal records. they were also paralleling it with firearm registration. which of course, we have already read articles where registration lists were being used to target motorists in I think it was New Jersey? so saying that the feds won't try to take away more of your privacy and that we are just exaggerating, does not test out to history
              Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by 9 years, 2 months ago
          how did we get the Patriot Act rocky? every time I argued against it, the loudest supporters who shot me down incidentally with the loudest, anti-reason arguments including that I was invoking nazism, were Conservatives. I work with Conservatives politically everyday. I have made many arguments for why Objectivists should find where we intersect and I have said Conservatives are principled. Did you support the birth of the Homeland Security? TSA? I'm just curious.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
          • Posted by Technocracy 9 years, 2 months ago
            I am a conservative, slightly to the right of Genghis Khan according to one political test I took years ago LOL.

            I did not support the creation of Homeland Security or the TSA. Both are just cases of giving the same crop of incompetents more power to do damage with.

            ESPECIALLY the TSA...
            Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
            • Posted by $ Abaco 9 years, 2 months ago
              Sure. And this is why the GOP is struggling so. Internally, it is divided. One faction wants more TSA, internal passports, warrantless wiretapping, and forced medical treatments (because there are people in caves who want to kill us and we're all going to die of measles and it's patriotic to submit because you've done nothing wrong, right?). The other side doesn't want those things. This is what I've seen. Perhaps I'm all wrong.
              Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
            • Comment hidden by post owner or admin, or due to low comment or member score. View Comment
            • Posted by Robbie53024 9 years, 2 months ago
              Had the airlines been left to provide their own security, and corporate CEO's been threatened with a personal charge of felony murder for any lost passengers, the issue would have taken care of itself.
              Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
              • Posted by Technocracy 9 years, 2 months ago
                I had my own solution or the islamic terrorist problem.

                Step 1 - recover all airline seats in pig skin
                Step 2 - give every other passenger a charged stun gun - excluding any the crew considers suspicious looking.

                Not only could that put a quick stop to terrorists, but it would do WONDERS for manners on aircraft :P
                Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
                • Posted by $ Abaco 9 years, 2 months ago
                  The Kid from Brooklyn did a rant years ago about handing out a bat to each person who's getting on the airliner. It's funny as hell and true. That would do it. That rant should still be on youtube. Enjoy...
                  Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by slfisher 9 years, 2 months ago
        Here in Idaho, where our Governor originally supported REAL ID and then changed his mind, we passed a bill in 2008 that we would not support REAL ID. Aside from the national ID implications, they are incredibly expensive and have security issues. Estimated cost for Idaho was $40 million. Our Governor said, "For that amount of money, I could buy every Idahoan a passport."
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ nickursis 9 years, 2 months ago
    A good example of why we cannot afford to "label" ourselves into a box. "Conservatives love to bleat about "freedom" yet their "freedom" is based on crap like this. A National Passport. As stated, this leads us right to the fascist nation where you are tracked and controlled by big brother. Has anyone thought of how this "passport" will work? A chip of course. A chip that will have all your personal data on it, that they can use for what they want, as well as can be stolen with ease because the buffoons in government are so far behind the criminals. This will have a very bad end for all of us, on so many levels. And no one will object in any real fashion...
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by DaveM49 9 years, 2 months ago
    One of the most universal acts of any totalitarian regime is to insert the phrase "your papers, please" into the vocabulary.

    I spent a month in Poland in 1992, as the country was still shaking off the vestiges of the Warsaw Pact era. It was common for Poles to make a big deal out of saying "Oh, I left my ID at home" or similar in public places. The reason behind it was that a long-standing law requiring that everyone carry identification had just been repealed. Everyone thought it very funny. Sometimes, others would join in, saying "I forgot mine too!" or the like.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by term2 9 years, 2 months ago
    TSA is a sham. Another expensive program of the government. Leave security up to the airlines themselves who own the planes !! And would be responsible in courts for the deaths if they didnt stop airline terrorists. Even better, let the Israelis handle airline ssecurity. I cant remember when I heard of an Israeli jet being hijacked....
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by richrobinson 9 years, 2 months ago
    My wife and I went to Epcot a few years ago. Waiting at the airport for the flight home I noticed a man with brown skin. I guessed he was from India. He was working on his laptop and got up frequently to look out at the plane. We were both freaked out. I was about to report this when I saw TSA agents (3) coming towards us with a cart of some kind. Certain they would question the man I sat down. They walked over to a family and asked their 14 year old daughter to take off her coat and they searched her backpack. I know her age bacause she happened to be seated next to me later on the flight home. My wife said if that man gets on our plane we are getting off. He waited for another flight and all was well but I have no confidence in TSA protecting us.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by slfisher 9 years, 2 months ago
      srsly? You're afraid of someone looking at a plane while being a laptop because they have brown skin?

      When I'm in an airport, I'm typically working on a laptop, a tablet (sometimes two), and a cell phone at once, and yes, I get up to look at the plane. Are you going to be scared of me, too? Or am I ok because I don't have brown skin?
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by richrobinson 9 years, 2 months ago
        No. My point was he was acting suspiciously and seemed agitated. Instead of questioning him they did the politically correct thing and questioned a white girl. Why not talk to him? Why not walk over and find out why he was so agitated? I am guessing they were afraid someone like you would scream racist.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by slfisher 9 years, 2 months ago
          I'm not screaming "racist," I'm screaming "stupid." Terrorists don't come in only one color, and as soon as we act like they are, that opens up a huge security vulnerability.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
          • Posted by 9 years, 2 months ago
            slfisher, actually statistics prove there is a high probability that terrorists are certain ages, certain sexes, from certain parts of the world, have recently visited certain parts of the world, certain religions...
            how about answering rich's question? why did they make a point of singling out a 14 year old girl who was not acting suspicious, and doesn't fit any of the criteria if profiling were used. that's what seems stupid to me. do not take my comments as a defense of TSA. In the US, this should be handled by the airlines themselves.
            Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
            • Posted by slfisher 9 years, 2 months ago
              "doesn't fit any of the criteria if profiling were used."

              How do you know? Simply because of her age and race?
              Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
              • Posted by 9 years, 2 months ago
                well, depending on geography, her age would not be high alert. nor her sex. put age sex and race together along with where has she traveled recently out of the geographic area and you have a low likelihood. this ain't rocket science slfisher.
                I am not saying that it couldn't change at some point. and reality sucks if you've just come into the US from Yemen and are muslim. I don't think skin color is a relevant factor. there was just a major arrest of three individuals, two were women, they were all Baltic immigrants. Now they weren't arrested for plotting an attack themselves, they were passing materials and money. But my point still stands when discussing air travel and terrorist attacks historically. But of course, you realize if the airlines were in charge of their own security they'd figure out the risk reward ratio of pissing off their customers, right?
                Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by ObjectiveAnalyst 9 years, 2 months ago
    Outrageous! There should be no checking of papers within the bounds of the United States of anyone unless there is reasonable suspicion of a crime. I find it appalling that the government is so inept that it cannot control the borders at the border... that border patrol agents are stationed miles away from the borders instead of at the border, or determine who is of concern at air terminals from international flights. My whole bloody state is now considered within the border "zone." This flies in the face of our freedom to travel within our nation without harassment. Our government has gone wild... It is the government oppressors that should be burdened and punished for their ineptitude, not the citizens.
    The constitution, "The Privileges and Immunities Clause of Article IV, Section 2 of the Constitution states that "the citizens of each state shall be entitled to all privileges and immunities of citizens in the several states." This clause protects fundamental rights of individual citizens and restrains state efforts to discriminate against out-of-state citizens. However, the Privileges and Immunities Clause extends not to all commercial activity, but only to fundamental rights."
    14th amendment, section 1. "Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

    http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionar...
    There can be little more fundamental than the right... the liberty, to travel unimpeded by big brother.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by wiggys 9 years, 2 months ago
    I truly wonder if there will be a storming of the bastille.
    I once had two hyway patrolmen come up my drive about 1/4 mile long to tell me they wanted to see my license in order to give me a citation because someone saw me on the interstate driving in their opinion erratically. my response was no to their request. when the pursued further I told them I was now going to call my attorney. they then said this could be worked out without paperwork and again asked for the license and agin were told no. they said there was a report so i asked who initiated this and the told me they couldn't devulge the info.
    my attorney went to the hyway patrol office and aske for a copy of the report. he knew the clerk for years and told him it was just a phone call.
    the point here is that they came on my property when i was in my house and i guess just thought that i would cooperate
    government agencies employees will try anything they can with the hope of getting away with what ever. unfortunately for us these civil servants do not have any idea of what they are doing to destroy the country.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo