TSA Requires National ID For US Citizens To Travel Domestically
Plenty of Conservatives see no problem with this. Of course, this is another chain they put around your ankle tying you to your govt as its slave. People need fundamental philosophical bases for their politics. There is nothing free about this.
Next up is DNA.
Isn't all this "Safety and Security" the oolest and most wonderful thing ever??!! It was cheap, too... all it cost us was a little more of that stuff called Freedom... Doesn't matter, as we've been giving that stuff up for a while now, a little teeny chunk at a time, for some more of that wonderful "Safety and Security"...
I feel Soooo safe.
I really hate this crap!
Also, I used to work in the sea port industry. In order to maintain access to the port we had to get a Transportation Worker Identification Credential (TWIC) issued by TSA. This card had all kinds of secutity measures including a holographic background and a chip loaded with biometric info. Sounds secure, right? A few months after mine was issued the fed database crashed so that the feds could not verify anything (apparently they must have had some IRS computer techs on loan to the TSA. Backups? We don't need no stinking backups!) Anyway, when I flew, just for the fun of it I would show my TWIC when the TSA yahoo would ask for my papers. Half the time they (THE TSA EMPLOYEE) would not accept their own issued ID. The rest of the time they pretended to know what it was and let me through...theater at its worst.
Jan
Jan
I don't think you were exaggerating or labeling. No, I can't name every conversation I have and every article I read in which Conservatives or Progressives said that they would be in favor of this or that. It doesn't mean I didn't read it or don't know it and add it to my general knowledge of the world today.
and my "coin" often lands Conservative side up because they talk at the talk, and that's it. They say they are different from Progressives, and the only different is in how much tyranny they will support.
I agree that Godwin's law doesn't apply, but only because nobody here has yet taken up TSA's side of the argument.
http://www.policestateusa.com/2015/tsa-t...
That's the "history" of the "Real ID." So, from the Referenced URL if you have a Driver's license that has a Bio-chip you already have a Real-ID and apparently most states except those listed in the article issue Real-ID's. States that are providing "Drivers Licenses" to Illegal's -- may be providing them the "power to vote." Obama's Executive Order which allows Illegal's to obtain legal status which allows them to obtain, among other items a Drivers License, may allow them an "ability to vote" -- even though they should not be allowed to vote.
Of course that doesn't mean non-citizens are supposed to be allowed to vote -- just that they're likely to be given the opportunity anyway.
This also tells me that these conservatives have totally forsaken the Constitution and the spirit of this great country.
Those who surrender freedom for security will not have, nor do they deserve, either one.”
― Benjamin Franklin
AUTHOR: Benjamin Franklin (1706–90)
QUOTATION: “Well, Doctor, what have we got—a Republic or a Monarchy?”
“A Republic, if you can keep it.”
ATTRIBUTION: The response is attributed to BENJAMIN FRANKLIN—at the close of the Constitutional Convention of 1787, when queried as he left Independence Hall on the final day of deliberation—in the notes of Dr. James McHenry, one of Maryland’s delegates to the Convention.
McHenry’s notes were first published in The American Historical Review, vol. 11, 1906, and the anecdote on p. 618 reads: “A lady asked Dr. Franklin Well Doctor what have we got a republic or a monarchy. A republic replied the Doctor if you can keep it.” When McHenry’s notes were included in The Records of the Federal Convention of 1787, ed. Max Farrand, vol. 3, appendix A, p. 85 (1911, reprinted 1934), a footnote stated that the date this anecdote was written is uncertain.
I fear our Republic has been lost, starting with Woodrow Wilson.
Alexander Fraser Tytler, a European historian published The Decline and Fall of the Athenian Republic. In his publication, Tytler reported that from his research he had determined the following:
"A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the voters discover they can vote themselves largesse from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates promising them the most benefits from the public treasury, with the result that a democracy always collapses over a loss of fiscal responsibility, always followed by a dictatorship. The average of the world's great civilizations before they decline has been 200 years. These nations have progressed in this sequence:
From bondage to spiritual faith,
From spiritual faith to great courage,
From courage to liberty,
From liberty to abundance,
From abundance to selfishness,
From selfishness to complacency,
From complacency to apathy,
From apathy to dependency,
From dependency back again to bondage."
We are at the stage of dependency now with more than 50% of this nation on some form of Government welfare. Conservatives giving up more freedoms for perceived security is placing us back in Bondage to the Government, and Tyrannical dictators.
One can not maintain freedom without thoughtful contemplation of proposed laws and the studious application of history. That is what made the Constitutional Conventions so valuable is that you had men there who were students of history and who were determined not to duplicate the mistakes of the past. I would even go so far as to label them real political scientists, because they were actually studying and formulating how government should work from examining the evidence of what had not.
The issue is do we want to give the OJT trained TSA agent the Authority to check the legal status of persons traveling domestically? My answer is NO, because they can barely keep the lines moving now can you imagine the amount of time needed if they added the so where were you born and of what country are you a citizen of line of questioning?
The problem is when we merged the various departments under one Customs and Border Protection agency they took on so many missions that they are now incapable really of doing any of them with any level of skill.
Federally approved is a well no not so much, but the privacy issue will come ino affect when you have to put statements on the license which identifies the person as NOT being a Citizen or a lawful resident of the US now the state is complicit with aiding and abbetting any anyone who accepts the ID for the cashing of a paycheck is also guilty. This truly can become an out of control debate.
But I agree with you this truely is a slippery slope.
There isn't a single reference in the article to either Conservatives and/or Republicans.
Why do you make that inference, then?
I suggest that the Progressives "see no problem with this", even though they aren't mentioned either. The article supports my statement just as much as yours.
Just my humble opinion....
If you really want to go after the Christian conservatives and get them on your side, just tell them that the Real ID Act is in reality the mandatory application of the sign of the Beast (666). That'll get their goats ;)
What you really need to do is ask these so-called conservatives if they align more with the Republican party or the Tea Party. That will give away where they stand.
Conservative enthusiasm for enforcing immigration laws is nothing but prejudice.
'Several' is just barely more than one, and a hell of a lot smaller than 'most'. You have made your disdain for Conservatives more than plain, and pick your words accordingly.
Just my humble opinion.....
Your 'nothing wrong, nothing to fear' is exactly what I hear from the Progressives I know...I have never heard it from my Republican friends.
If that is your opinion, then state that. Don't infer that the article makes the same claim...because it doesn't.
Just my humble opinion...! ;-)
First it was "Plenty of Conservatives see no problem with this."
And now it is "We hear it on this site quite frequently."
And the coup de grace: "...but with friends like this who needs enemies? "
I see a perfect opportunity to leave this site...'of my own free will'. Consider it done!
You're saying the same thing I'm saying. You align with *people* who support liberty. You don't find the senator who was most opposed to the Patriot Act (Russ Feingold) and support his entire party.
Wasn't it the news lady Megan Kelly who recently said that sometimes you need a little big brother? (Fox News) The media sets the agenda, whether we like it or not. The Neocons have been leading us down the left trail like a bunch of blind hikers. They are typically pretty statist, IMO. Let's see how this develops...
Any other Conservatives feel the 'jab'?
Just my opinion....
I agree with you that the airlines ought to be responsible for their own screening and that if they were smart, they'd train their screeners just like the Israelis.
I did not support the creation of Homeland Security or the TSA. Both are just cases of giving the same crop of incompetents more power to do damage with.
ESPECIALLY the TSA...
Step 1 - recover all airline seats in pig skin
Step 2 - give every other passenger a charged stun gun - excluding any the crew considers suspicious looking.
Not only could that put a quick stop to terrorists, but it would do WONDERS for manners on aircraft :P
I spent a month in Poland in 1992, as the country was still shaking off the vestiges of the Warsaw Pact era. It was common for Poles to make a big deal out of saying "Oh, I left my ID at home" or similar in public places. The reason behind it was that a long-standing law requiring that everyone carry identification had just been repealed. Everyone thought it very funny. Sometimes, others would join in, saying "I forgot mine too!" or the like.
When I'm in an airport, I'm typically working on a laptop, a tablet (sometimes two), and a cell phone at once, and yes, I get up to look at the plane. Are you going to be scared of me, too? Or am I ok because I don't have brown skin?
how about answering rich's question? why did they make a point of singling out a 14 year old girl who was not acting suspicious, and doesn't fit any of the criteria if profiling were used. that's what seems stupid to me. do not take my comments as a defense of TSA. In the US, this should be handled by the airlines themselves.
How do you know? Simply because of her age and race?
I am not saying that it couldn't change at some point. and reality sucks if you've just come into the US from Yemen and are muslim. I don't think skin color is a relevant factor. there was just a major arrest of three individuals, two were women, they were all Baltic immigrants. Now they weren't arrested for plotting an attack themselves, they were passing materials and money. But my point still stands when discussing air travel and terrorist attacks historically. But of course, you realize if the airlines were in charge of their own security they'd figure out the risk reward ratio of pissing off their customers, right?
The constitution, "The Privileges and Immunities Clause of Article IV, Section 2 of the Constitution states that "the citizens of each state shall be entitled to all privileges and immunities of citizens in the several states." This clause protects fundamental rights of individual citizens and restrains state efforts to discriminate against out-of-state citizens. However, the Privileges and Immunities Clause extends not to all commercial activity, but only to fundamental rights."
14th amendment, section 1. "Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionar...
There can be little more fundamental than the right... the liberty, to travel unimpeded by big brother.
I once had two hyway patrolmen come up my drive about 1/4 mile long to tell me they wanted to see my license in order to give me a citation because someone saw me on the interstate driving in their opinion erratically. my response was no to their request. when the pursued further I told them I was now going to call my attorney. they then said this could be worked out without paperwork and again asked for the license and agin were told no. they said there was a report so i asked who initiated this and the told me they couldn't devulge the info.
my attorney went to the hyway patrol office and aske for a copy of the report. he knew the clerk for years and told him it was just a phone call.
the point here is that they came on my property when i was in my house and i guess just thought that i would cooperate
government agencies employees will try anything they can with the hope of getting away with what ever. unfortunately for us these civil servants do not have any idea of what they are doing to destroy the country.
Load more comments...