Cruz: Miracle of America

Posted by khalling 9 years, 2 months ago to Politics
62 comments | Share | Flag

Other than when he gets preachy I think this sounds pretty good. He takes to the campaign leading off with the most important concept -natural rights. How refreshing. His list is ok but I think it 's a mistake to run on the marriage issue and there wasn 't enough talk about pulling up regulations and out of control agencies. Also not a peep on govt intrusion into privacy.
SOURCE URL: http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/01/24/exclusive-ted-cruz-details-path-to-victory-for-epochal-fork-in-the-road-2016-election-with-miracle-of-america/


Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by kathywiso 9 years, 2 months ago
    I may be partial, but Ted Cruz has stood against the enemy while in office several times and let's not forget he read from Atlas Shrugged during the filibuster last year.. We need a change and someone who stand for Right...The Constitution and the American Freedom to achieve your goals by earning them.. Oh, I won't get my hopes up either, but I will fight for what is right.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by term2 9 years, 2 months ago
    SOMEONE needs to attack big government on its lack of performance and efficiency. Most, if not all, the things government does arent done very well and are expensive (if you can find out in fact what they spend on it). Non-crony capitalist Private enterprise, with the competition that follows, does it better and cheaper. Even welfare is done cheaper, given how much the government bureaucracies spend on administration, and the lousy job they do
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by starznbarz 9 years, 2 months ago
    Since 2010 I`ve had the opportunity to meet and observe Both Cruz and Paul on several occasions over a couple years in private, as well as public environments.
    When the camera isn`t on them, or they are at a private function and are not "on" is a great time to make character assessments.
    Cruz has my vote, he is Constitutionally intelligent, speaks directly without "lawyer speak" and has a deep, real, respect and love for our Nation. According to several folks, including his father, he is "fearless" - I believe they are right. I watched, at a private event,(no TV camera`s) as he treated the servers with the same attitude and attention as he did some extreme VIP`s that were at the event - that speaks volumes as to character.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by RonC 9 years, 2 months ago
    Many years ago, a wise mentor explained to me that the choice between right and wrong is not hard. You can teach a four year old when it's safe to cross the street. The issue in politics is "who do they owe, and what do they owe?"

    Already it is reported that Jeb Bush has cut off Romney by attracting the dollars that would have gone to Romney had Bush not entered early.

    This is not a lament on my part, but rather an observation that who ever would challenge the establishment must out last the huge communications advantage that attracted money affords the "chosen" candidate.

    To me, personally, the messaging of freedom, self reliance, less regulation, less gov't largess, etc. over shadows the big dollar campaigns. The reality, I fear, is the low information voter; and there are many of both political stripes.

    I, and many others on this forum, look for the message dear to us. Low information voters lap up whatever is fed to them by the loudest voice in the marketplace.

    Whoever survives will not only have to outlast the obvious preferences of the media, but also the gauntlet laid down by the establishment of their own party.

    There is a voice in the wilderness. Will it be in tune with the times enough for good people to hear it and be moved to action?
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ blarman 9 years, 2 months ago
      Please no more Bushes. My two preferred choices are Ted Cruz and Rick Perry. Rand Paul isn't bad either, and I'd definitely support Scott Walker.

      Absolutely no? Jeb Bush, Chris Christie, John McCain (yes, there is actually talk of him running yet again), anyone from New York.

      Maybe's: Allen West (he'd be a great Sec Def) or Ben Carson. I'd also love to see someone like Trey Gowdy as Attorney General.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by RonC 9 years, 2 months ago
        In my daughter's life, she's 38, she was a toddler during the Carter years. for most of her memorable life there has either been a Bush or a Clinton in the White House. The pundits are now confirming the last 8 years have been an aberration, and the probable choice for 2016 is Bush or Clinton. From her point of view that must seem very close to a bifurcated monarchy.

        From my view, they say Romney had his chance and lost, he should bow out. Fair enough! I say the establishment machine lost as well and there should be some new blood besides Romney's replacement. There has to be more people well qualified besides Jessup and Hillary.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by 9 years, 2 months ago
        I've been talking to a number of people who live in TX who are Conseratives and haven't been happy with some crony stuff they say he's been involved with. but I don't remember any details. Perry just fizzled so badly last time around. He came off arrogant and also is a lousy public speaker. Dr. Carson is just too clueless about the economic picture. He also rarely chooses to speak about economics which I see as the cornerstone of the platform
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by $ blarman 9 years, 2 months ago
          I didn't say any of them are perfect, just that those are the ones in the running I would prefer.

          My favorite line from "Master and Commander" comes into play here - something about the lesser of two weevils... ;)
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by Rocky_Road 9 years, 2 months ago
        If you had lived in Florida during Jeb's two terms, you would probably have a different (read: better) opinion of him. He downsized our state government tremendously, and did wonders for education.

        Jeb Bush was HATED by state employee, and teacher, unions...and that was good enough for me!
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by H2ungar123 9 years, 2 months ago
    Agree that Cruz was good but thought Newt
    was much stronger in his views. Especially
    liked when he noted the Golfer's "lisp" in being
    absolutely unable to pronounce the words
    "islamic radicals.' More! More!
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ blarman 9 years, 2 months ago
      Gingrich is a talker and could definitely school the rest of the Republicans on how to deal with the media, but I despise the man - especially after he went after Paul Ryan's budget plans. He'll get no love for me.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by Flootus5 9 years, 2 months ago
        I'm still roughed raw by how Gingrich ran the charge into the ditch with "Contract" back in the 90's.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by Rocky_Road 9 years, 2 months ago
          His "Contract With America" was a stroke of genius and a political success, and even managed to get a welfare reform bill past Bill Clinton's two vetoes...not to mention a balanced budget in spite of a liberal executive branch.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
          • Posted by Flootus5 9 years, 2 months ago
            What I saw was that half of his "Contract" was blatantly unconstitutional, but his "leadership" after '94 directly led to Clinton getting elected a second time in '96, when he clearly should have been a one term president. And then a scandal plagued, impeachment bound second term caused Clinton to "moderate". And remember, the balanced budget was achieved by raiding the Social Security Trust fund.
            Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
            • Posted by Rocky_Road 9 years, 2 months ago
              If I can use a famous quote from the Battle of the Bulge: "Nuts"!

              Use this link to see all that the Contract gave to us:
              http://www.heritage.org/research/lecture...

              Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
              • Posted by Flootus5 9 years, 2 months ago
                Without abusing a famous quote from a famous hero, I would just pose the question of how does the state of the federal leviathan today compare with that of 1994? Bigger, badder, more in debt, more intrusive, more out of control and on and on. How well did Gingrich's Congress pan out in this light? The Contract with America is basically a Neocon Manifesto.
                Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
                • Posted by Rocky_Road 9 years, 2 months ago

                  "The ten items in the Contract were all acted upon in the first 100 days of the new Congress, which is what the signatories had pledged. Nine of the ten items in the Contract passed the House: Only the constitutional amendment on term limits (which required a two-thirds vote) was defeated. Out of a total of 302 roll call votes on issues related to the Contract With America, the conservatives prevailed on 299 of them. A balanced budget amendment passed in the House by a 300-123 margin but was subsequently defeated as it fell one vote short of the two-thirds needed for passage in the U.S. Senate. The overall margin by which the items in the Contract were passed averaged about 70 percent despite the fact that the Republicans only held a 12-seat margin over the Democrats (52-48 percent, the smallest House majority margin in 40 years). Given the notorious lack of party discipline in the American Congress, the passage by a large majority of nearly all of the items in the Contract was a remarkable achievement."

                  http://www.heritage.org/research/lecture...

                  The tutorial goes on to address every one of the 10 promises in the Contract, and their lasting effects on our government. Take a moment from building straw men, and learn the truth.

                  P.S. I would rather "abuse" a quote (which I didn't)...then abuse history.

                  Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
                  • Posted by Flootus5 9 years, 2 months ago
                    Actually I did read the 10 "promises" in the Heritage Contract summary, just now before posting and to refresh my memory of when I read the whole book back in 94. We had such hopes with the Republican Revolution back then. By 2005, I concluded to myself that it is official: The American people have lost control of their government.

                    Notice that the Heritage article repeats several times that the origins of the modern conservative movement goes back about 30 years from 1994 to the Goldwater Campaign era. That is the birth era of the William Buckley inspired neoconservative movement that replaced the "old guard" that were strict constitutionalists.

                    So, I would repeat the question: Where did the Contract With America get us?
                    Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
                    • Posted by Rocky_Road 9 years, 2 months ago
                      We are a two party system, so the 'battle' never ends. Every 'victory' only hardens us for the next obstacle.

                      The Contract gained us precious political ground, and it would be frightening to contemplate just where we could be today, if we had simply conceded that 'ground' out of hand.

                      Newt did well for our side...don't dismiss him for not eliminating all liberals from our political landscape...!
                      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
                      • Posted by Flootus5 9 years, 2 months ago
                        OK, I'll reconsider my evaluation of Newt. I have liked him as an historian and commentator, but was disappointed as a politician. Like I said there was such high hopes there in the 90's that headway could be made and it really came to naught. It kinda comes under the heading of a long slow death versus bring it all on and get this waiting over with.

                        It's good to see your optimism. I haven't thrown in the towel that things will work out no matter how dark it gets, but I did pass the Rubicon back there in the belief that the two party system and any shining knights to be seen as crusaders is an illusion. The leaders are in our own mirrors.
                        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
            • Posted by CircuitGuy 9 years, 2 months ago
              "And remember, the balanced budget was achieved by raiding the Social Security Trust fund. "
              I agree with everything else you said, but there was no move to raid the SS trust fund. People say that to express the idea that surplus at a time when baby boomers where in their prime earning years should not be counted toward the general budget surplus/deficit and the idea that maybe we should count future SS obligations as debt. I agree with those points. I'm just saying there was never a pile of money in a trust fund that someone transferred out to call the budget balanced.
              Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
              • Posted by Flootus5 9 years, 2 months ago
                Apparently there are those that would disagree. I recall it being an issue with Clinton and Congress in the late '90's, but hardly unique. And not the only factor in balancing the budget.

                https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index...

                http://judymorrisreport.blogspot.com/201...
                Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
                • Posted by CircuitGuy 9 years, 2 months ago
                  From your first link: "Here's how the raid works: The surplus payroll tax dollars go into the Social Security Trust Fund, which in turn uses them to buy special issue bonds from the U.S. Treasury. "
                  US Treasuries are the benchmark of low-risk investment in the investing world. So taking the money and putting in Treasuries is not raiding it.

                  I know some people think deficit spending will eventually lead to a monetary crisis, which will cause Treasuries to lose significant value, in real terms. But that hasn't happened yet. Treasury holders are doing very well lately in this insanely falling interest rate environment, which we know has to end at some point. I reject they are not a bona fide investment.
                  Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
                  • Posted by Flootus5 9 years, 2 months ago
                    The definition of raid is approaching semantics. Consider this:

                    For those taxpaying hard working citizens, a certain percentage of their income has gone to fund Social Security and Medicare. Each of these programs holds massive trust funds that are supposed to pay out to beneficiaries, present and future. The trust funds are required by law to buy US government debt in the form of bonds from the Treasury. Given that every single US taxpayer is an ultimate beneficiary of these trust funds, they are the biggest holders of US debt. The US Government is bankrupt, kaput! - with the only measure of bailout being these trust funds. Debt! Let alone deficit or an illusionary balanced budget.
                    Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
                    • Posted by CircuitGuy 9 years, 2 months ago
                      "Debt!"
                      Yes. We refuse to deal with it. Everyone knows it's a problem and at some point it will come to a head, but we are determined to wait until it comes to a head rather than dealing with it now.
                      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
                      • Posted by Flootus5 9 years, 2 months ago
                        True enough and well said. A very important statement/question, when looking at Armageddon in the face - do nothing? How can this be? This would be a great new thread.
                        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by Mamaemma 9 years, 2 months ago
    I think he sounds great. I am afraid to get excited about any potential candidate. I am so passionate about my values and my country, and it is too heartbreaking to have Obama and his ilk in control of my country and more importantly, my life. I have given up on seeing things get better. Now I concentrate on living and cherishing my life.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by 9 years, 2 months ago
      but of course, you must define "your country." Michelle Obama said it was her country too, when she announced she was proud, for the first time.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by Mamaemma 9 years, 2 months ago
        Excellent point. Actually, "my country" is Galt's Gulch, and I want the USA to be more like that.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by $ jbrenner 9 years, 2 months ago
          Thirty years ago I thought the USA was Galt's Gulch. Now I feel like a stranger and an alien. I am in the 11 months per year outside the Gulch, and am only in the planning stage for building the Gulch.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
          • Posted by CircuitGuy 9 years, 2 months ago
            " am only in the planning stage for building the Gulch."
            I have a feeling your Gulch will spring up faster than you think b/c so many people crave freedom.
            Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
            • Posted by $ jbrenner 9 years, 2 months ago
              It's possible that the Gulch might spring up quickly. My parents are probably both in their last year of life. If they don't use up a large part of their life savings on companion care, then my wife and I will inherit enough money to go from well off on our own earnings to financially ready to retire with their inheritance. For those planning to retire here rather than in Atlantis, get home care covered under your long term care insurance; my parents got nursing care and assisted living covered, but not companion care in their own "unassisted" living. While waiting for a place in secure assisted living to open up, we are paying $500/DAY in companion care expenses. That adds up really fast.
              Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by ObjectiveAnalyst 9 years, 2 months ago
    Hello khalling,
    We could do worse and my oh my have we!
    Ted Cruz is not perfect, but we don't need perfect. We need someone with integrity, a strict adherence to the Constitution and respect for individual rights. We have had far too much of the collectivist mantra (for the public good, fair share... detritus...). We don't need another establishment type or another elitist royal family plutocrat (e.g., Bush, Clinton).
    “The true test of a man’s character is what he does when no one is watching.”
    ― John Wooden
    The problem today is that character and integrity seem to be dis-qualifiers... I hope this has changed.
    Regards,
    O.A.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by kathywiso 9 years, 2 months ago
      Agreed OA, I would LOVE to see someone just Tell the Damn Truth...this lying through your teeth in every situation makes me crazy. Stand up and say, "This is what we are dealing with, This is Freedom and That is Communism, explaining the DEFINITION of each with actual examples, because you know the public school system has made the one look so much better, which do you want !!" When all the votes are counted, you will know how soon the lights go out..
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by ObjectiveAnalyst 9 years, 2 months ago
        Hello kathywiso,
        The lack of informed voters and the apathy displayed by so many of our youth is something we must overcome.
        First we must demand that future voters know some history and civics. I heard today that in my State one of our State representatives is pushing a bill that requires that one "pass' a civics class before graduating. To date one only need take one; passing it is not required.
        Sad: http://insider.foxnews.com/2015/01/26/wa...

        Regards,
        O.A.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by 9 years, 2 months ago
      Well OA, I hope you 're right. and I wonder and hope that people with integrity have the character to stand up for their values and challenge others on theirs. I think strong character is worth a whole heap of "experience "
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by $ winterwind 9 years, 2 months ago
        K & OA - unfortunately, people don't want character or integrity, or values either. I think there are may be 2 groups" [those who divide people into 2 groups, and those who don't...] There are the ones who are frightened, don't know what to do, and let themselves be influces by the media, their friends and families and ads. They know they have to do something, but they don't have any idea of what that something is, let alone how to go about accessing it.

        A few groups don't count, because they can't be influenced: the power brokers and other slime; the "I always vote the straight Democratic ticket!" and the people who don't think at all - these last either vote or don't.

        The other group to be considered is the one that CAN be influenced, DO want change and everything better that goes with it. These, we can get to - but imagining things as being different as they are is one of the hardest thinking tasks there is. We have to get to them individually and in small groups, and begin where they are, and not overwhelm them with true things which are too much for them to take in all at once - pace them, I guess I would say. It is a slow and tiring and sometimes dispiriting process. I hope to see positive results; I've seen the negative ones - the infighting, the dumbing-down, the unwillingness to do the whole job - the people who want to get elected but don't want to do the whole job, like raising money and making appearances on their wife's birthday;] and the people who attach themselves to a "winning" party, just to get elected.

        You've gotta believe in tomorrow -----------
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by ObjectiveAnalyst 9 years, 2 months ago
        Indeed. One would think that after what we have suffered in recent years, they would wake up and see that character matters. However, I was quite astounded and disturbed by a recent poll that put O's approval rating back up to 50%... Really? The explanation given by one of the talking heads was that he was given credit for an improved economy due largely to falling energy prices... I suspect/hope it was a fluke; otherwise boy are the ignorant masses ignorant... One can only hope that this particular poll was an outlier, taken by a limited number of respondents... The midterm election is the only poll that matters and obviously the numbers polled ... I am trying to put my "faith" there and hope it is an awakening of sorts.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by samrigel 9 years, 2 months ago
    I like Ted Cruz, Rick Perry, Scott Walker and Sarah Palin pretty much in that order. But what we really need is someone seriously right of center and I believe those fit that bill.. Time to move on from the Bush's, Clinton's and Romnery. We need someone who has the stuff to put America back at the top where she belongs. But we also need remember that Congress has a say and they scare the hell out of me. And jbrenner please let me know when the Gulch is ready!!
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo