Top Gulch Point Earners of 2014
19,000+ members in the Gulch now, but you guys... you guys are my heroes. Looking forward to spending more time with you here in 2015.
- khalling: 21,973 (http://www.galtsgulchonline.com/khalling...)
- Robbie53024: 16,010 (http://www.galtsgulchonline.com/Robbie53...)
- LetsShrug: 13,855 (http://www.galtsgulchonline.com/LetsShru...)
- jbrenner: 11,673 (http://www.galtsgulchonline.com/jbrenner...)
- rockymountainpirate: 11,602 (http://www.galtsgulchonline.com/rockymou...)
- Non_mooching_artist: 10,361 (http://www.galtsgulchonline.com/Non_mooc...)
- richrobinson: 10,153 (http://www.galtsgulchonline.com/richrobi...)
- ObjectiveAnalyst: 7,586 (http://www.galtsgulchonline.com/Objectiv...)
- freedomforall: 6,426 (http://www.galtsgulchonline.com/freedomf...)
- Eudaimonia: 6,413 (http://www.galtsgulchonline.com/Eudaimon...)
- Zenphamy: 6,046 (http://www.galtsgulchonline.com/Zenphamy...)
- AJAshinoff: 5,192 (http://www.galtsgulchonline.com/AJAshino...)
- blarman: 4,824 (http://www.galtsgulchonline.com/blarman)
- CircuitGuy: 4,490 (http://www.galtsgulchonline.com/CircuitG...)
- Susanne: 4,432 (http://www.galtsgulchonline.com/Susanne)
- dbhalling: 4,023 (http://www.galtsgulchonline.com/dbhallin...)
- Mimi: 3,955 (http://www.galtsgulchonline.com/Mimi)
- Herb7734: 3,784 (http://www.galtsgulchonline.com/Herb7734...)
- straightlinelogic: 3,622 (http://www.galtsgulchonline.com/straight...)
WELL DONE.
- khalling: 21,973 (http://www.galtsgulchonline.com/khalling...)
- Robbie53024: 16,010 (http://www.galtsgulchonline.com/Robbie53...)
- LetsShrug: 13,855 (http://www.galtsgulchonline.com/LetsShru...)
- jbrenner: 11,673 (http://www.galtsgulchonline.com/jbrenner...)
- rockymountainpirate: 11,602 (http://www.galtsgulchonline.com/rockymou...)
- Non_mooching_artist: 10,361 (http://www.galtsgulchonline.com/Non_mooc...)
- richrobinson: 10,153 (http://www.galtsgulchonline.com/richrobi...)
- ObjectiveAnalyst: 7,586 (http://www.galtsgulchonline.com/Objectiv...)
- freedomforall: 6,426 (http://www.galtsgulchonline.com/freedomf...)
- Eudaimonia: 6,413 (http://www.galtsgulchonline.com/Eudaimon...)
- Zenphamy: 6,046 (http://www.galtsgulchonline.com/Zenphamy...)
- AJAshinoff: 5,192 (http://www.galtsgulchonline.com/AJAshino...)
- blarman: 4,824 (http://www.galtsgulchonline.com/blarman)
- CircuitGuy: 4,490 (http://www.galtsgulchonline.com/CircuitG...)
- Susanne: 4,432 (http://www.galtsgulchonline.com/Susanne)
- dbhalling: 4,023 (http://www.galtsgulchonline.com/dbhallin...)
- Mimi: 3,955 (http://www.galtsgulchonline.com/Mimi)
- Herb7734: 3,784 (http://www.galtsgulchonline.com/Herb7734...)
- straightlinelogic: 3,622 (http://www.galtsgulchonline.com/straight...)
WELL DONE.
in civics and politics- dangerous as it gives power.
in fun and games- it is fun and games.
It is an honor to be among such company.
hrmm...
This trip is sounding better and better.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gYLiLVyD...
It's supposed to be below -10 without the windchill.
Uh... no.
Why do you look at your own profile.
I just can't stop posting. Such controversy, such intelligence, such fun. So many topics -- but almost miraculously, so many smart people worth writing to. Thanks is barely good enough.
Happy New Year!
Why do you get to limit your descriptions to those who behave "rationally?" If self interest is the virtue, then why isn't it so if taken to the extreme? And in this context, Madoff merely took his own self interest to an extreme point. Yes, he lied and cheated, that's what it took for him to realize his self interest.
This is where I think that Objectivism fails. You cannot say that a little self interest is good, but a lot is bad. It is either good or bad.
Nobody here wants to answer the BAOTB postulate. If my self interest is good, then what stops me from just trampling over everyone else's liberty to get whatever I want? My self interest is paramount.
I hear this retort - "because the only way to ensure one's own liberty is to recognize the liberty of others" - Why? What universal axiom makes that so? I have provided countless examples of individuals throughout history that have not behaved according to that maxim. Some of them died of other than old age because of it, but so what? Is the Objectivist ultimate objective merely to die of old age? So those people ultimately were killed by a Badder ass, so what? They lived and did what they wanted in their own self interest. We still remember, hell, study many of those people - Alexander the Great, Cleopatra, Hitler and Stalin. I posit that those people made a bigger impact on the world - for good or evil - than any 10 Objectivists ever will.
As I'm often told - check your premises.
Not a rant against you, kh, merely a rant.
self interest is paramount" -
Rudeness is not a prerequisite for being an Objectivist. This thread was a goodwill gesture, an end-of-the-year salute of appreciation.
MM should stop behaving like that guy Sheldon from ’The Big Bang Theory” He’s not nearly as cute or as funny.
Here Mike: let me show you how it’s done:
“Happy New Year’s Everyone!”
Believe it or not --THAT was in my best interest.
this!! And a Good Healthy Happy 2015 for
all!
The word 'rational' is wrong here.
I have seen contexts where 'rational' means 'enlightened', whatever that means.
Try this:
It should be 'reciprocal'. something like a trade.
Each accepts only the rights and obligations given to others.
Rights and obligations are severely limited to the right to be left alone, and the obligation to leave others alone.
Thanks for that, Scott... it's easy when you are among like minds!
Thanks to everyone at Atlas productions for providing this place to meet and exchange ideas.
Happy 2015 and beyond to all Gulchers!
May we find our way to the real Gulch this year.
But I think I owe it to everyone to merely post for points.
I'll make sure I've pulled down a big long-neck instead of stepping on some baby stegosaurus.