Galt's Gulch

An argument for climate change

Posted by $ blarman 9 years, 4 months ago to News
4 comments | Share | Flag

I liked this argument not because it promotes the nonsense of anthropogenic warming, but because it presents the reality that choices involve trade-offs, and to ignore either side when discussing a problem is just irrational.
SOURCE URL: http://humanevents.com/2014/12/10/climate-catastrophe/?utm_source=hedaily&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl

Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by fivedollargold 9 years, 4 months ago
    The King of Global Warming can't fill a room anymore with climate sycophants. The money train is headed off the tracks. $5Au is curious to see what the former Vice-president's next scam will be.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by Ben_C 9 years, 4 months ago
    I pretty much agree with Stossel's positions across the board. The arguemetns against the Chuch of Global Warming are endless, ie: CO2 is a good thing - plants need it, solar flairs and ocean volcanoes contribute more than man, water vapor retains more heat than CO2, etc etc etc. So, stop showering and washing clothes (let alone your SUV) and we can save the planet!
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by Zenphamy 9 years, 4 months ago
    Some sides I already know aren't going to be tasty. Why shouldn't I pass those up?

    Climate changes and has since this planet was formed. So what? Thinking that we can control that is the epitome of, "Like the ant resting on his back on a leaf floating down the river with an erection, yelling 'Raise the draw-bridge'."
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo