Battery Acid and Toilet Paper by Robert Gore | STRAIGHT LINE LOGIC

Posted by straightlinelogic 9 years, 5 months ago to Economics
18 comments | Share | Flag

This is an excerpt, click the link above for the full article.

Befitting an egalitarian paradise, essentials—copies of President Nicolás Maduro’s latest speech—are plentiful, while luxury items like toilet paper are nowhere to be found. (Enemies of the state use the former as a rough substitute for the latter.) Other luxuries—milk, gasoline, electricity, water, diapers, soap, beans, tortillas, hard currencies—are also in short supply. In the US, where store shelves are packed with toilet paper in a variety of textures, plies, softnesses, sizes, and package quantities, any politician whose policies produced a shortage wouldn’t win 5 percent of the vote. Maduro won an election last year. In Venezuela, deprivation has been the winning platform, admiration of US plenitude a sure ticket to electoral oblivion, and good riddance to retrograde running dogs who emigrate to capitalist cesspools.
SOURCE URL: http://straightlinelogic.com/2014/11/01/battery-acid-and-toilet-paper-by-robert-gore/


Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by fivedollargold 9 years, 5 months ago
    Venezuela was a wonderful little gem in Latin America until Chavez and his cronies turned it upside down--something akin to what Obama is trying to do to America.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ jdg 9 years, 5 months ago
    When I ask a US socialist what they hate about capitalism, I invariably get back a description of crony capitalism -- in other words, the counterfeit is being mistaken for the real thing. It's time for us to become more vocal when the cronyists brag about the success of their "capitalist" ideas. Otherwise we'll never get anywhere.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ Snezzy 9 years, 5 months ago
      Why not use the term "cronyism" to better distinguish it from capitalism?

      In an agricultural sense capitalism is the production and planting of seeds. The opposite is "eating the seed corn" (or burning it), and that is what anti-capitalists of all kinds recommend. Cronyism is a method of conspiring to steal others' seed corn while suggesting there is plenty of it to be eaten.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by Flootus5 9 years, 5 months ago
      This is well said. I have fought with this for 45 years with my 60's raised progressive liberal sister and brother on law. The ever present response: Yeah, but.....
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by hattrup 9 years, 5 months ago
      I agree.
      Although I admit I may have difficulty finding a non-crony capitalism example - which makes me somewhat concerned that capitalism is not quite at resilient to corruption as I would like - although still much better than socialism, communism, or other forms.

      So i like the idea, but need some great current examples of how well non-crony capitalism is doing
      (perhaps I need to look in eastern Europe...)
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ jlc 9 years, 5 months ago
    You have hit the nail on the head straightline, when you observe that capitalism is the only system that does not rely on violence. If, magically, no one could take anything from anybody then capitalism would still work, though all other economic systems would not. (It would have to be noted that such a capitalism could still contain voluntary socialisms, however.)

    There would be a problem in 'contract enforcement'; I think some sort of economic shunning would have to be the 'punishment'. Interesting thought touchstone.

    Jan
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by Herb7734 9 years, 5 months ago
    We are cashing in on 100 years of teaching and preaching. We have let our education systems, go unsupervised, and college debates and demonstrations go unanswered. So now we wonder what in the world causes people to prefer socialism or communism when they clearly cannot produce the benefits of capitalism. The Republicans might win the upcoming election, but not because they have challenged the Democrat's stupidity. It's that the leadership of the Dems based on their ideology is so very bad that it managed to penetrate their promise of largesse for everyone.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ winterwind 9 years, 5 months ago
    When you have learned all you know about Capitalism from Socialists, why would you possibly speak out in favor of it? Just because people are Americans, they are not inclined toward Capitalism.
    Besides, there are hard things about it that are obviously and immediately true, like "he who does not work may not eat"; the Socialists hide the bad stuff about their position behind the bushes and people have to discover it - and for every person saying something bad about socialism, there are 3 socialists following him around saying "that's not true! where did you hear that? says who?" and the like. The truth is drowned out.and people who also don't know anything about morality, logic, rhetoric or observation are powerless.
    oooh, tax brackets.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by IndianaGary 9 years, 5 months ago
      Not sure who -1ed you or why. You have a good point and it relates to the socialist takeover of our educational system starting back around the time of John Dewey; perhaps even before.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by richrobinson 9 years, 5 months ago
    Great article Straight. It's hard for me to believe the number of Americans that openly speak out against Capitalism. The results of Collectivism and Capitalism would appear to be obvious.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by CircuitGuy 9 years, 5 months ago
    It's an interesting question: why do people turn to socialism when history shows capitalism delivers the goods. In Age of Turbulence, Alan Greenspan goes coves some of the same ideas in this article, esp that traditions set in preindustrial times exhort us to share.

    This article speculates that modern proponents of socialism are not influenced by tradition, piety, etc. I suspect they actually are influenced by traditional values going back to pre-industrial times; they may don't know it though.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by ObjectiveAnalyst 9 years, 5 months ago
    Hello straightlinelogic,
    Another great article.
    It occurs to me that in my life time something dramatic has changed in the public perception. I no longer see the reports in the MSM of the shortages like toilet paper, food, and other essentials that were commonplace reports from places like the old USSR, Cuba and many other Marxist leaning nations. I hope the market will eventually win out and promote viewership of news channels that expose the truth once again. There is some indication that viewership is down on channels that obfuscate.

    I believe a solution, or at least a major move in the right direction, would be to take over or create more MSM outlets as well as non-traditional information sources aimed at the young that disseminate the truth of these conditions. We remember the lessons of history, but it would seem that many today are being shielded from this reality. When was the last time and how often have any of us heard about these conditions and the types of ideologies/political philosophies guiding the course of these impoverished nations? If anything we hear some nonsense about how these nations are impoverished because of some policy of the U.S., As if it is our fault ... We must be exploiting their resources or labor markets... keeping them impoverished through international policy.

    Somehow, right thinking people who know the difference between Capitalism and Crony Capitalism, must make the case again, clean our own backyard, while pointing to the truth about these Marxist nations and their repeated historical failures.
    Regards,
    O.A.

    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by teri-amborn 9 years, 5 months ago
    As a child I watched Captain Kangaroo change the Russian fairy tale "The Little Red Hen" from an analogy of what Communism REALLY manifests in human nature to what the progressive left WANTS for it to manifest in human nature.

    The former analogy is based in reality, the latter in fantasy...and I knew it at age 5.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by 9 years, 5 months ago
      You know, when I was six, I remember a Sunday school teacher telling me about communism, and how everyone would produce according to their abilities and everyone would get what they needed. I remember telling her that it wouldn't work, that people do things for themselves, not other people. It really is not that hard to grasp, if five and six-year-olds get it.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by plusaf 9 years, 5 months ago
        And your Sunday school teacher had confused 'needed' with 'wanted,' which, over time, has made all the difference...

        I have been noodling over a new Falk's Law to read something like "From each according to our arbitrary taxation; To each according to our whim."

        :)
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo