Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by $ blarman 9 years, 6 months ago
    There are so many problems with this I don't even know where to start.

    First is the presumption of guilt that is being laid on every driver on this road.
    Second is the sheer stupidity of stopping everyone going down the road for anything other than reasonable suspicion. This isn't a border crossing.
    Third is the suspension of Fourth Amendment rights. How is it legal to force a blood draw without a SPECIFIC warrant for that individual?

    I hope this gets taken to court and those who instituted this policy get fired and jailed.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ allosaur 9 years, 6 months ago
    Just in time for Halloween--
    Greetings, zis is Count the Cop Comrade Citizen, pulling drivers over und instructing zem to say, "Vat do you vant from me? Blood?"
    Zat is when I burp, emit mein creepy laugh und say, "Only if it is spiked."
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by khalling 9 years, 6 months ago
    wtf! I hadn't seen THIS yet:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s8zYrLJGj...
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ winterwind 9 years, 6 months ago
      feeling rather queasy here....it's hard to do a blood draw on me unless you listen to how I tell you to do it - and these guys certainly wouldn't listen....
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by 9 years, 6 months ago
        I hadn't thought of that. My mom hates to give blood. She would probably pass out. What about folks with medical conditions? Are they prepared for that? Doubt it.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by $ winterwind 9 years, 6 months ago
          actually, the condition they are prepared for is to not sanitize the area with alcohol - they are instructed to use iodine. Aren't some people allergic to iodine?
          same song, 7,324th verse: do they care? no, no, no, no, NO!
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by 9 years, 6 months ago
      I wonder why the forced blood draw? If they have a warrant give them a choice of pleading guilty to DUI or a blood test.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by $ Susanne 9 years, 6 months ago
        Jails and Police Stations are notoriously NOT the cleanest places on the planet, so you trust them to stick something into your arm? Gross!!

        When I saw that, my thought was - don't they use a similar technique to perform lethal injections? Hey, as long as the serf is under their control, why not give him a tracking implant and ID chip... Obviously it's warranted, as he had this silly notion of having rights, and then said they were being violated...
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by 9 years, 6 months ago
          I thought of that as well. I think when the Police have probable cause and a warrant the person is taken to a hospital to have their blood drawn. I would be going nuts if they tried this in my town. I wonder what the local reaction will be?
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
          • Posted by $ Susanne 9 years, 6 months ago
            Local reaction? Likely, none, as they police *must* have had a reason to do that, otherwise they wouldn't have, therefore the guy has to be guilty!

            (Sadly, I hear this from a preponderance of the serfs - especially the younger ones...)
            Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
            • Posted by khalling 9 years, 6 months ago
              I hear it right here in the Gulch. I remember when I posted the infamous body cavity roadside search post-there were lots comments supporting the officers' actions. I was stunned, frankly
              Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
              • Posted by $ Susanne 9 years, 6 months ago
                At one time the police were held in high regard, as they were there to protect the citizens against the criminals... now they'e there as our local militia to keep the citizens in line, as the municipal government knows all their citizens are criminals... because, the thinking goes, if all of *us* are criminals, our constituents have to be worse than us...
                Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
          • Posted by $ jlc 9 years, 6 months ago
            You are correct. If they want blood drawn, they take the person to the nearest hospital.

            I almost got fired* because I refused to draw or process any 'legal blood alcohols'. I had no problem doing medical blood alcohols (person found unconscious or delusional), but I would not draw for legal purposes (though I would have if the patient had freely asked me to). I personally believe that this violates the 5th Amendment by making your own body 'testify' against you. If you are visibly unsafe in your driving, then the police have evidence based on that behavior (and it does not matter if it is due to alcohol or the fact that you were crying your eyes out 'cause your guy just dumped you or were too tired to drive and were falling asleep at the wheel).

            Jan
            *What saved me is that very few med techs LIKE to work graveyard shift. If they had fired me, all of the med techs in the lab would have had to pull Call after hours until they found another licensed MT to pull the shift).
            Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
            • Posted by CircuitGuy 9 years, 5 months ago
              "I almost got fired* because I refused to draw or process any 'legal blood alcohols'."
              It's so much easier to make up little excuses to make life easier. Not taking the easy route inspires every other person watching, even if they don't say anything, even if they don't agree with you. By doing the right thing, even for people who disagree you've put the question on the table: is this moral. How they answer it is less important that they see it as debatable. This doesn't even mention the courage you give to people who agree.
              Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by $ winterwind 9 years, 6 months ago
        It's interesting, in a sick sort of way. Some states are finding out that breathalyzers aren't that accurate, so they want something more accurate. Courts have held that a blood tense is an unreasonable search, so they have to get a warrant. The police who do these things have a judge at the ready, usually on the phone but sometimes present, and crank the warrants out.
        Some jurisdictions allow you to refuse a "blow", but those people who do are getting a sharp shock. It's a mess, because it's administered on a county level.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by khalling 9 years, 6 months ago
        control. they are training our law enforcement in police state techniques. They may say it's for "safety" but did you watch that video??!!! Once I have you strapped down, I can not only take your blood, but you're alarmed and combative, I can give you a drug to calm you down...I can waterboard you for information. It's chilling enough, that 6 professionals, including the nurse drawing blood, are eerily calm (the guy who puts them in a head hold!) -but what was the most chilling, were the women. They went to that gurney willingly-and the smallest woman-did you see the shock and fear in her eyes once they had strapped her down? They went willingly...
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by 9 years, 6 months ago
          Yes. Six professionals agree to take part in this. None of which understand the Constitution or they just don't care. I wonder how many cities have done this or have plans of doing it?
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
          • Posted by $ Susanne 9 years, 6 months ago
            Of course... they were just following orders...

            Interesting the sheriff wants to use this to "educate" the citizens he can get a warrant and force them to have their blood drawn against their will... What kind of education is this?

            Then again... Isn't this one of those counties that made the news for using military vehicles for police work (allegedly for "public safety", actually as a form of "Public education and control")?
            Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
          • Posted by khalling 9 years, 6 months ago
            I don't know. but I can tell you that doesn't happen in the country I'm in. There is this insidious slow frog boiling of consent, this will be over quickly, it's court ordered which makes it "right" the head hold, the emotionless participation of the officers. Some get off on that, and you know that-I'd say the buzz cut sheriff for one. It's out of a graphic novel. I won't sleep tonight
            Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by Zenphamy 9 years, 6 months ago
    Who thought it was a good idea? The National Highway Traffic And Safety Administration (NHTSA). It's been taken over by MADD in the last several years. They provide grants to local police to conduct these just as they do the Enhanced DUI patrols. The officers get overtime and the local governments get free money.

    The legality is supposedly based on a telephone warrant by a magistrate or judge.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ winterwind 9 years, 6 months ago
    We've got elections coming up. A question that MUST be asked of every candidate is whether or not they 1> are in favor or this or 2> will comply if/when elected. and then there should be a fucking FIRESTORM.
    We've got a week, folks. I gave up politics, as I've said, because it's bad for me - but that doesn't mean I'm bad at it. Find out where the candidates are appearing, and ask them if there is open questioning. If there isn't open questioning, heckle them with the question, pointing out that you would be happy to sit down and shut up when they answer it. Don't take any nonsense about "I don't know about it": make an appointment within the next 3 days to allow them to find out about it. Find out.
    I want to know the states where this is happening, and I'm going to start with Colorado.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by johnpe1 9 years, 6 months ago
    Rich, this appears to be one more event which goes
    to prove that we must be vigilant FOR our governments
    since they will not do their jobs and maintain vigilance
    on our behalf.

    let's see::: we hire them to do a job, and then
    have to do part of that job -- defending our
    freedoms -- because they won't do it. sucks. -- j

    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by wiggys 9 years, 6 months ago
    Rich,

    excellent question, but will it ever be answered? probably not.

    Give someone a little power and low and behold they think they are king. It comes from the top down as in the case of 0. this type of behavior is happening all over the country and it will continue to happen. sure this incident was exposed but that doesn't help those who were initially affected by it. the "i'm sorry" attitude is meaningless, because they who perpetrated the event are not. there is no stopping the degradation of what was OUR country. those who follow these orders are our enemies. more nails.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by Temlakos 9 years, 6 months ago
    I can barely understand: you don't want anyone to drive with an impairment. So in the fear that an inexperienced officer cannot spot a drunken driver by the way he handles his vehicle, they stop everybody, drunk or sober. So now at least one sheriff's office says, "No more."
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by 9 years, 6 months ago
      Pennsylvania does checkpoints where officers stop all vehicles and if someone shows signs of being impaired they are questioned further. If not, you go on your way. I just can't fathom why any law enforcement officer thought this was a good idea...or legal.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo