Where Do You Fall Politically?
Here is another one of those "tests " They say upfront you are to answer with your feeling so be prepared that your reason will find the phrasing of many of the statements you might tend to agree with, frustrating.
SOURCE URL: http://politicalcompass.org/index
1) they make the effort to examine lots of politicians and "state" leaders for where they fit in the spectrum as they define it, but they make NO EFFORT whatsoever to examine where producers fit politically. They make no mention whatsoever of the people who have created the wealth of the world through hard work.
2) They have placed no "state" leaders in the lower right quadrant that represents more libertarian social thinking and more free market economics.
Correctly so, don't you think?
I found some of the questions frustrating because they didn't offer a none-of-the-above, or no-opinion response, but I scored right-libertarian, so, I guess go with gut works.
Military action that defies international law is sometimes justified
It depends. That can't be answered absoluly.
I realize many of these types of quizzes rely on other questions to better zero on your thoughts. Which I suppose is fine, it seemed to flush out where I sit properly
Military action that defies international law is NEVER justified.
To me, if NOTA is a frequent complaint... that may just indicate that the choices provided are poorly crafted in the first place. :)
When I saw that I was almost exactly in the same location where they placed Milton Friedman, I was delighted.
Funny to observe that. Isn't it?
P.S. I am now going to be very careful where I place my apostrophes, among other things ;-)
Economic Left/Right: 8.38
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -0.41
just barely into the bottom right quadrant
I am not saying it should be that way, but sheeple do not read, they just want more stuff.
I consider this trend the main reason for the slowdown in advancement across so many fields of knowledge.
Art and writing INSPIRES people. How many people do you find inspired by anything external to themselves any more?
:)
Sorry... :)
</alleged humor>
Up/Down -4.25
The questions were obscenely manipulative.
Frustrating, over simplified, and lacking any choice of answer that reflects my thinking.
Obviously, I don't fit anywhere in their political spectrum.
If I was a politician, that would be a reason for my obvious superiority and an excuse for my singular suitability to rule.
I'm curious if the site would let me go back in and print out [do a screen shot, probably] of the questions. I don't remember them well enough to say much about them - except that they over-fulfilled my frustration quotient for the day!
Regarding empire builders vs defense-only that Temlakos talked about, I expect most empire builders are also authoritarian and most territorial defense-only. There certainly will be exceptions.
I also imagine (wonder if there's any data to support it) that most people fall below the horizontal axis. To get elected, though, it's effective to try to get people upset with their neighbors about religious and personal issues, which means the politicians have to be above the line.
I think this is because I did not respond well to some of the statements that were intentionally written to evoke feelings or knee jerk responses. They tell you that's how they designed them.
For example, the statement where you had to agree that business people and manufacturers were more important than writers and artists, I completely disagree with. However, if I selected strongly disagree it was going to throw me more to the middle than I actually am. there were several like that, where I wasn't sure whether to say slightly agree or slightly disagree, often because there was more than one concept in the statement. I agreed with one part but not the other part.
I read about that in the FAQ. Based on that, it's better to have a moderate score, not at the extreme ends.
Then the more I went through this test, it gets worse... it starts from a pro-socialistic, pro-Leninist viewpoint and sets sail from there to the land of Marx.
I can't stand "tests" that are skewed to force you into a certain viewpoint, especially when it's against your moral fiber or sociological thinking. It reads like something put out by Soros Marketing and World Domination, llc. I admit, I didn't get to the 3rd page - after all, breakfast this morning was good, and I was at grave risk of losing it!
I've often felt one should add another axis to that: the militarism axis. Scores: from zero (pure aggressive, the Empire Builder's place) to 10 (immediate territorial defense only). I wonder how many of us would score in such a "cube"?
Libertarian/authoritarian -5.33
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -0.41
The only person I was at all close to was Milton Friedman.
Authoritarian - for damn sure
Right? Seriously
Obama is so far left he would have to look over his right shoulder to bay at the moon.
"Controlling inflation is more important than controlling unemployment."
I ended up almost exactly where they put Friedman (Milton, not Marty, which latter I would expect to be a better match,) but... they think Obama is of the "Right"...!
:rolls eyes:
Final score: 5.38 individualist, -4.36 self-control.
and
Economic Left/Right: 6.38
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.00
I wasn't very surprised...
Pretty consistent, I'd say... though I don't like the way they seem to equate "Libertarian" with "Anarchist"...
Soc -3.54
It'd be interesting to plot our little group,
It'd be really interesting to see where AR or LP land.
(How far have I strayed?)
I scored 0.38 to the right on the left/right axis and -7.33 (far libertarian) on the authoritarian/libertarian axis.
I wonder what percentage of the population scores in the lower two quadrants. If you click on the 2012 election part, it claims that Romney and Obama were next to each other in the center of the authoritarian right quadrant. That rings basically true to me. That means we have many people in the bottom two quadrants, but no mainstream candidates for us. I would love to see a president or several Congressman in the libertarian zone. I would like to see them as president, but part of their program would be they're going to get into office and decrease the powers of the presidency, which is tough to sell.
Any political program which displays the least bit of philosophical consistency is tough to sell to the American electorate. Barry Goldwater (1964) and George McGovern (1972) found that out.
Load more comments...