Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by ObjectiveAnalyst 9 years, 6 months ago
    From 49 till 79 we were the manufacturing powerhouse of the world. The manufacturing capacity/infrastructure of much of Europe had been devastated by the war. Middle class manufacturing jobs were plentiful and demand for American products were high.
    I also wonder (though correlation is not necessarily causation) how a comparison of a graph of government growth/spending alongside of the provided graph might coincide...
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by Zenphamy 9 years, 6 months ago
    I'm not sure that I'm comfortable with the implication that 'income growth' is a good thing unless it's equated with wealth created or value gained and I'm sure not OK with calling 90% the middle class. I think we're losing focus here.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by 9 years, 6 months ago
      Good points. You are right that they did not specifically call out wealth that was created or value gained. But the point they're trying to get across is unless you're in the top 1% income bracket ~ you're losing out via inflation.

      While I don't know about your situation, my financial side, while the salary is fine (slightly stagnating), my expenses have gone up. I have compared prices of choice items from today to what I paid 4 years ago (yes, I keep records) and the inflation is what's causing my expenses to rise, not my demand or quantity.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by Zenphamy 9 years, 6 months ago
        Yes, the buying power of my income has decreased-dramatically in fact. I also keep records. And I think the same is true for all of us. And there has been a drastic shifting of wealth in the country.

        But I'm still not comfortable with describing things in the terminology and emphasis utilized by the author, 'income growth' instead of inflationary spiral (wage increases chasing inflationary costs generated from decreased dollar value). The terminology tries to shift cause and affect from government caused inflation to the payer of wages.

        In as much as the 1% utilize the ability of government influence to protect their buying power that aren't available to the rest of us-I don't like that. But that should still be in indictment of the government-not just those able to utilize the government inspired manipulations.

        I encounter too many people blaming the 1% instead of what we've allowed our government to become.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by CircuitGuy 9 years, 6 months ago
    I agree with most of this article. It says the post-WWII period was an unusual period of wealth equality. It leaves it to the reader to ask why, how to get it back, and if we should even want to take action to get it back.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo