You and I both! He is an amazing man.

I do agree with what you said. Yes, absolutely the candidate who is a proven constitutionalist is the one who SHOULD, if there were any brains left, win. I'm looking at Tom Foley, weasel, as the conservative candidate here, tax and overspend Malloy as the socialist, er, democrat incumbent, or Tea Party backed Joe Visconti. He is my choice by a long shot. The problem is if he pulls viable votes away from a non democratic candidate running in opposition to the thieving crony Malloy. He isn't generating enough momentum at this point to overtake Malloy, and this is the quandary. The best person to be governor is Visconti. Will he have a snowballs chance in hell here? No. This state is already crippled with taxes, and so far upside down fiscally, we rank dead last in the country. But the moochers don't want that money train to stop. Problem with that though, is the money is LEAVING the station...

Before any candidate can make a difference in our messed up political quagmire they have to get elected. Most third party can't get enough votes and only water down votes for republicans no mater how great that third party person may be.Even if they get into office their agenda will be overlooked.

Yes I know...there aren't any of those." I'd have to differ in that opinion. There is one possible candidate that would rather not run, but will if he feels he would be the most likely to actually put the constitution back into the government, and probably say goodbye to Obamacare, Obamacore, Michellefood, and other unnecessary and unconstitutional programs. Anyone at this site has got to know who I'm so far actually impressed with. He also seems to listen and actually respond to what was said, not just respond with trash. And he seems to have solutions to many of our issues. Hell, he even stated that he would listen to advisors, even listen to the military professionals, and others. Questioned why he thought he would be a good president, having no experience in politics, he said that political experience is what is wrong with politics today, they are nothing more than politicians. I even doubt he would seek a second term if he got a lot straightened out in one term. He is not a politician by anyone's definition. Wasn't that somewhat the way Ronald Reagan was, good heart and good mind, made for a good president?

thanks for pointing that out. I also disagree with that

I may have missed my calling... :-)

Well, he did fulfill one promise - hope and change... He changed us from a free nation to one oppressed, and gave us hope that he and his ilk would vanish... the sooner the better.

If no one votes for something other the Status-quo monoparty system (two names, one party?) then we are never going to break the hold the monopoly holds on us, and we delve deeper into the morass of totalitarianism and serfdom.

Having voted Libertarian for quite a while (except my bleak and misguided leftist years, when I voted indy or green) my not voting for either the RP or DP has not made one whit of difference. People tell me "You're throwing your vote away by not voting such-and-such"... I tell them by voting for more of the same-ol' same-ol', under the guise of "the lesser of 2 evils" THEY are...

...For the lesser evil is still... evil.

Oh,no doubt. Perot’s run was responsible for putting Clinton in office.

Howdy Doody?
You must be as old as me.
I suggested my beagle. One bark for yes, two barks for no. I'll bet she'll do better than the BHO regime. And by the way, she IS a bitch.