Now, Non-Fiction

Posted by Grahame 9 years, 7 months ago to Business
4 comments | Share | Best of... | Flag

I work in an industry that constantly is calling upon mobile cranes to come to job sites to perform various tasks. These mobile cranes are just like the giant ones you see building sky-scrapers except they are mounted on trucks and not nearly as large. There are generally two categories of these machines - large and small. The large cranes used to rule the landscape as they had the carrying capacity needed for most jobs. However with the advent of building technologies more sections of buildings are being made off-site and then placed by cranes when they arrive. These sections have continually gotten lighter and smaller and as such the large cranes are not as needed as they used to be. Smaller cranes can handle most of the work now. This has lead to a glut of large cranes sitting idle and not making any money, thus not paying off the investment made in them in the first place. The smaller cranes are owned by different companies than the large cranes. The large crane companies have been petitioning the government to have a safety rule implemented that would restrict any mobile crane to only be allowed to lift HALF of it's maximum carrying capacity. This would put the smaller crane companies out of business and force the hire of the larger, now obselete, crane companies.

Atlas Shrugged: Now Non Fiction!


Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by $ Susanne 9 years, 7 months ago
    Typical looter mentality - instead of going out and FINDING the work for their big boys, make the government make others do business with you.

    Why not (*gasp*) use the larger cranes for the smaller work? Sure, the profit margin wouldn't be as large, but they'd still be earning, rather than this attempt at mooching. Or better - use your MIND and come up with a way that the big boys can do the job more efficiently than their smaller counterparts.

    Heck, I'm not a crane operator or rigger, but having seen some of these operate at sites, I can think of ways to do it - especially with current semi-automation technology...

    It's be like me telling the government to pass laws that modern CNC machinery can only be operated by hand, one operation at a time, because they have an "unfair advantage" over my manual equipment I use for one-off stuff, instead of applying my profits to upgrade my gear and come up to their standard - IF I wanted to change my focus and do production fabrication...
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo