22

"The Strike"

Posted by sdesapio 7 years, 10 months ago to Entertainment
93 comments | Share | Best of... | Flag

FUN FACTS
1. Atlas Shrugged took 12 years to write.

2. The working title of Atlas Shrugged was, "The Strike." It was actually Frank O'Conner, Ayn Rand's husband, who recommended "Atlas Shrugged" after the book was finished.

3. We're making another movie.

WHAT!? :)

Working on the Atlas Shrugged films presented us with some of the most challenging moments of our lives. It was rewarding too of course, but Challenging - with a capital C. Why? Those of us on the crew with any knowledge of the material were vastly outnumbered by those with none... by 1 to 100. I could count us on one hand. And at times, one finger.

The result? The movies do not adequately convey the message of Atlas. Period.

And, THAT WAS THE WHOLE POINT OF MAKING THE MOVIES - to accurately convey and propagate the message.

But, what if we had another shot? What if we could do it all over again from the beginning? What if we could put together the ideal team of artisans whose sole purpose it was to finally bring Atlas to life as it was meant to be?

I spoke at length yesterday with John Aglialoro, one of the Producers of the films and sole owner of the movie rights to the book.

If you're at FreedomFest today in Vegas, John's going to be on a panel. You may want to attend.

We're making another movie.


Scott DeSapio
Associate Producer, Atlas Shrugged 3


All Comments

  • Posted by TheLightHouse 7 years, 5 months ago
    With DJT as the President - Elect, now more than ever Atlas Shrugged rings true.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by TheLightHouse 7 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Thank you. Atlas Shrugged needs to be a continuing series on NETFIIX. The ending in the third movie has so much future possibility. I liked Part 1 and 2 the best of the original trilogy, part 3 needed much more time than given.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by ta61885 7 years, 8 months ago
    First of all, Thank You!
    Now to business,. Here is how I would approach it.
    The philosophy would be narrated in addition to the visual application. Like Dune was narrated to explain thoughts during the movie. I would show the real life degradation of current neighborhoods that used to thrive. Expose the truth that our nations brightest people in science aren't even American but visitors with temporary visas. Play real hard on the whiny entitled feeling that so many people do not even realize they have and run it to it's conclusion repeatedly. Then show it again in a different industry. Then show it again and again that shows people for what they are. Instead of not wanting to be the "bad guy" in the movie, make it so they don't want to be seen as the "moocher". I would love to go on and on but I have more work to do. $$$ TA
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Zarathustra 7 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I agree, a mini-series may be the best way to address something with the length and depth of Atlas Shrugged.

    Think of the recent John Adams mini-series put out by HBO. Can you imagine something like that condensed into a movie, or spread out into 3 movies a year or more apart?
    I think a movie, or trilogy of movies, will only work if you have a huge budget.

    A mini-series is much more workable. Also, you can make the entire series at one time, to ensure that you have the same actors portraying characters throughout, for one thing.

    The 1st attempt at making the movies was at least an attempt. But if we are honest with ourselves in true objectivist fashion, fell way short of the mark. Those films felt much more akin to several of the "christian" films and christian programs of recent years - poorly produced productions that only "true believers" will want to see, programs that preach to the choir but will never generate interest or be seen by outsiders.

    This time lets be sure to get it right, and to put some real money into this. It's better to do this fully-funded, or not at all.
    Someone should approach Peter Thiel this time to fund this.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by patricking 7 years, 8 months ago
    Whatever you do, raise enough money to hire one cast just for the sake of continuity. Going from part 1 to part 2 was like an acid trip. Wouldn't telling such a big story be easier on the cast and crew AND on the viewers as a miniseries? A miniseries would certainly take the message further.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by dean23819 7 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I agree with this proposal with the proviso that nothing be cut-out and that the miniseries be absolutely true to the book. Why not merely make a multi-season series of the book?. The public is wise enough to translate the philosophical aspects and period to the present as we all did. We didn't have to update the Civil War to modern warfare to enjoy "Gone With The Wind".
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by radical 7 years, 10 months ago
    Start the movie with Anna Rosenberg's birth and early childhood in St. Petersburg. Then portray the seizure of her parent's pharmacy and Rand's demonstrating her admiration for America - taking her surname from the American-made Remington Rand typewriter. Show her risking her life to escape from Russia and coming to the U.S. Then bring in her fictional characters and develop the plot - her romance with Branden compared to Dagny and Rearden, Galt, D'Anconia. Run with it.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by msmith55 7 years, 10 months ago
    sI think the book requires too much time for a single movie, we should think in terms of a Series, made for television, but with a complete rewrite to make it match what is happening now, to bring it into the present.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by jwm2 7 years, 10 months ago
    It needs to be done better this time. A mini series would be better but you're really going to need a great screenplay writer who knows the material and keeps the dialogue tight.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Nbbg1 7 years, 10 months ago
    Clint Eastwood would bring this book alive! This is one of the best books ever written, deserves someone like Clint to bring to the masses.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by khalling 7 years, 10 months ago
    oh. um, John walked out of his FreedomFest talk last year. what happened?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ winterwind 7 years, 10 months ago
    [running, probably with a straight razor]
    oh, boy. yes, please. ok, yeah, right, OK. squeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee .

    where's the employment office?

    I refuse to enter the debate on miniseries v. movie; on which actor, which role; on "how to..."
    I find such debates annoying, certainly pointless after the fact, and generally a waste of time. Most of it is opinion being presented as truth.

    The observation that not enough people knew anything about the material they were using is brilliant. Achieving that will make whatever is done have that vital look of having been produced and driven by a single mind.

    Again, where is that employment office? See you there.
    edited for emphasis
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by RFugi 7 years, 10 months ago
    I believe a mini-series is the way to go. Maybe in the vein of the BBC Sherlock series. For those that haven't seen that show a season is made up of 3 episodes that are an hour and a half long each. So my two cents are 3 seasons that correspond with the book, with three episodes of 1 1/2 - 2 hours long each.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Wanderer 7 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Yes, I'm working on some shorts that dramatize basic principles of philosophy and economics. They're meant to be simple but, entertaining, to appeal to young people, who've been trained to multitask and so, grabbing their undivided attention is tough.

    Atlas Shrugged cannot be made a successful film in its native state, as AS 1-3 have shown. It must be carefully dramatized, with much less and much shorter dialogue. Dagny's inner thoughts have to come out but, since we're viewers, not readers, they have to come out via her expressions and interactions with other characters.

    It can be done. I'd love to try it.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by lrshultis 7 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I understood AS and Rand's other works from when I first started reading them in 1966. I have never understood how she could live the life that she may or may not have chosen. That is why a drama about Rand's life or those appearing in novels are much more interesting than any ideas that they may have in novel form. Ideas are not what most people dwell upon. They prefer the mundane everyday stuff that makes life worth living.
    As for virtue, any acting human has virtues by which they gain their values. It is what one believes to be a value that is the key. Some choose values that further life and are rational. Others choose values that are anti-life and have virtues by which they will try to gain such, shell we say evil, with them. What makes life interesting is that no two people have all the same ideas and thus are individuals. Hard to like many of them for everyone.
    Philosophical speeches will bore audiences, even those who know the speeches. Can there be a way to dramatize important ideas as Rand did in a movie without explicitly giving speeches?
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo