Trumpian revolution isn’t counterrevolution. The Progressivist-Globalist push toward global, welfare police statism mesmerized academia. media since fomenting the late 1890s Spanish American War...

Posted by bubah1mau 4 months, 3 weeks ago to Politics
6 comments | Share | Best of... | Flag

...and Progressivist-Globalism saw its political form further taking shape in the US with creation of the Fed in 1913 and US interventionism to escalate Europe’s “Great War” into WWI, with the US ultimately assuming financial responsibility for a war it didn’t create through the 1925 Dawes Gold “Loan” to Germany and the Young Plan that froze $2 billion in German/Austrian bonds held by US banks and citizens in early 1929.

Progressivism was then realized politically in the 1930s under FDR’s New Deal, further enhanced with a Globalist dimension as FDR cornered Axis forces into dragging the US into the European-Asian conflict that became WWII.

So Progressivist-Globalism is today hardly a “revolution.” It’s a more than century-old, established political dynasty that today in the US has striking resemblance to the tottering Tsarist regime of Nicholas II’s Russia. Biden (AKA Bribe’m) bares a historical likeness to the insecure Nicholas II, leading unsuccessful, globalist interventions in northern Korea in 1903 (provoking the Japanese surprise attack on Port Arthur) and invoking war support for Serbia in late July 1914 to precipitate disastrous war with the Hapsburgs.

Bribe’m is fated to be the last of the Progressive-Globalist dynasty as his nefarious conduct will inevitably lead to a global nuclear war, or, if fortune has it in the nick of time, the installment of Trump or a Trump-like Constitutional Originalist, even if it takes a Bolshevik style revolution to overturn the Progressivist-Globalist dynasty.


Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by mhubb 4 months, 3 weeks ago
    The Trump movement is a hope to restore the US Constitution

    like all such things, it is a hope as nothing is perfect
    it is simply our best hope to start a correction
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by mccannon01 4 months, 3 weeks ago
    Nicely put. I never thought to compare Xiden to Nicholas II and similar events repeating in history. I have a very nice book in my library published in 1906 written and photographed by actual participants and witnesses in the Russo-Japanese war (old book a little tattered, but stunning piece of history). The Japanese really kicked Russian butt. Later speculations blame the Czar's ineptness during this war costing so much Russian life and treasure that it was the actual trigger event that set the stage for the Bolshevik revolution 10 years later.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by mccannon01 4 months, 3 weeks ago
      I rechecked the above and the book was actually published in 1905 and is titled "The Russo-Japanese War: A Photographic And Descriptive Review Of The Great Conflict In The Far East". I wish I could share it with the history buffs here in the Gulch because it's images and verbiage are enormously fascinating and historic. The Russians were completely outclassed by a very modern Japanese army for its day in both equipment and tactics.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by 4 months, 3 weeks ago
        Thank you for your comments mcc. I picked up a hardback copy of Moorehead's 1958 The Russian Revolution 1917 off the "free" shelf at my local public library, and have found the first few chapters fascinating reading.

        As we see before our own eyes the toxic exhalations of the crumbling Progressive-Globalist dynasty (e.g.

        1) rabid, suicidal anti-nationalism evidenced by protracted open-border policy,
        2) kowtows to intuitively inhumane transgender ideology, incessant proselytizing that men can be women and women men when the actual result can only be eunuchs,
        3) glorification of minorities codified into racist pseudo-theory,
        4) pointless, duplicitous meddling in/perpetuation of international conflicts),

        I immediately see parallels with the irrational influence Rasputin’s whims had on Empress Alix—and consequently on official policy, even military strategy, invoked by Nicholas II.

        Regardless of their source(s), unforgivable, treasonous, borderline-insane Bribe'm policies are entirely indicative of a collapsing, floundering dynastic regime that can only prop itself up in power by rigging elections and hassling, imprisoning opponents. For better or worse, we'll live to see this farce's end—as I'm sure the final act is due on stage in the immediate future.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by 4 months, 3 weeks ago
    BTW, Wikipedia provides a classical definition of Progressivism as follows: A political philosophy that holds that it is possible to improve human societies through political reform or through government mandates.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo